506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21704449)
21. Diagnostic value of CT-guided biopsy of indeterminate renal masses.
Eshed I; Elias S; Sidi AA
Clin Radiol; 2004 Mar; 59(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 15037139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biopsy of a renal mass: where are we now?
Laguna MP; Kümmerlin I; Rioja J; de la Rosette JJ
Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Sep; 19(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 19571757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Real indications for adrenalectomy in renal cell carcinoma.
Moudouni SM; En-Nia I; Patard JJ; Manunta A; Guillé F; Lobel B
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2002; 36(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 12201919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in management of small renal masses.
Wang R; Wolf JS; Wood DP; Higgins EJ; Hafez KS
Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):586-90; discussion 590-1. PubMed ID: 19118884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Observation should be considered as an alternative in management of renal masses in older and comorbid patients.
Beisland C; Hjelle KM; Reisaeter LA; Bostad L
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1419-27. PubMed ID: 19147267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Percutaneous core biopsy for renal masses: indications, accuracy and results.
Lebret T; Poulain JE; Molinie V; Herve JM; Denoux Y; Guth A; Scherrer A; Botto H
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1184-8; discussion 1188. PubMed ID: 17698122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic yield of renal biopsy immediately prior to laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation: a multicenter study.
Kyle CC; Wingo MS; Carey RI; Leveillee RJ; Bird VG
J Endourol; 2008 Oct; 22(10):2291-3. PubMed ID: 18937593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy of solid renal masses: analysis of safety, efficacy, pathologic interpretation, and clinical significance.
Alle N; Tan N; Huss J; Huang J; Pantuck A; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jul; 43(7):1813-1819. PubMed ID: 29079986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of accuracy of 14-, 18- and 20-G needles in ex-vivo renal mass biopsy: a prospective, blinded study.
Breda A; Treat EG; Haft-Candell L; Leppert JT; Harper JD; Said J; Raman S; Smith RB; Belldegrun AS; Schulam PG
BJU Int; 2010 Apr; 105(7):940-5. PubMed ID: 19888984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Image-guided biopsy of small renal masses in the era of ablative therapies.
Salem S; Ponsky LE; Abouassaly R; Cherullo EE; Isariyawongse JP; Maclennan GT; Nakamoto D; Haaga JR
Int J Urol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 23190309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Diagnostic value of percutaneous biopsy of the renal masses. 73 cases].
Daniel L; Barriol D; Lechevallier E; André M; De Fromont M; Charafe E; Coulange C; Pellissier J
Ann Pathol; 2000 Mar; 20(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 10740006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can renal mass biopsy assessment of tumor grade be safely substituted for by a predictive model?
Jeldres C; Sun M; Liberman D; Lughezzani G; de la Taille A; Tostain J; Valeri A; Cindolo L; Ficarra V; Artibani W; Zigeuner R; Mejean A; Descotes JL; Lechevallier E; Mulders PF; Perrotte P; Patard JJ; Karakiewicz PI
J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2585-9. PubMed ID: 19836799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Renal cell carcinoma sub-typing by histopathology and fluorescence in situ hybridization on a needle-biopsy specimen.
Barocas DA; Mathew S; DelPizzo JJ; Vaughan ED; Sosa RE; Fine RG; Akhtar M; Scherr DS
BJU Int; 2007 Feb; 99(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 17092279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Revisiting CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions: contributors to biopsy success.
Omura MC; Motamedi K; UyBico S; Nelson SD; Seeger LL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):457-61. PubMed ID: 21785094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Characterization and staging of renal tumors: significance of MRI diagnostics].
Kalinka A; Gerlach A; Arlart IP; Günes N; Hauser TK; Würstlin S; Bosse A
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16508837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Partial nephrectomy for renal masses ≥ 7 cm: technical, oncological and functional outcomes.
Long CJ; Canter DJ; Kutikov A; Li T; Simhan J; Smaldone M; Teper E; Viterbo R; Boorjian SA; Chen DY; Greenberg RE; Uzzo RG
BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(10):1450-6. PubMed ID: 22221502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Metastatic potential in renal cell carcinomas ≤7 cm: Swedish Kidney Cancer Quality Register data.
Guðmundsson E; Hellborg H; Lundstam S; Erikson S; Ljungberg B;
Eur Urol; 2011 Nov; 60(5):975-82. PubMed ID: 21741160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses.
Schmidbauer J; Remzi M; Memarsadeghi M; Haitel A; Klingler HC; Katzenbeisser D; Wiener H; Marberger M
Eur Urol; 2008 May; 53(5):1003-11. PubMed ID: 18061339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
