These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21704683)

  • 1. Maintained generalization of delay-specific remembering.
    White KG; Sargisson RJ
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jul; 87(3):310-3. PubMed ID: 21704683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychophysics of remembering.
    White KG; Wixted JT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Jan; 71(1):91-113. PubMed ID: 10028693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?
    Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of interference and retention delay on temporal generalization performance.
    Rattat AC; Droit-Volet S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1903-12. PubMed ID: 20952787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalization of delayed matching to sample following training at different delays.
    Sargisson RJ; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11256863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coding in pigeons: Multiple-coding versus single-code/default strategies.
    Pinto C; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 May; 103(3):472-83. PubMed ID: 25894105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post-choice information processing by pigeons.
    Martin TI; Zentall TR
    Anim Cogn; 2005 Oct; 8(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 15744507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amount-dependent temporal discounting?
    Ong EL; White KG
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 15157973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory without awareness: pigeons do not show metamemory in delayed matching to sample.
    Sutton JE; Shettleworth SJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):266-82. PubMed ID: 18426309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some observations of the effects of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons.
    Roberts WA; Kraemer PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1982 Oct; 8(4):342-53. PubMed ID: 7175446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal generalization gradients following an interdimensional discrimination protocol.
    Vieira de Castro AC; Vasconcelos M; Machado A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1701-18. PubMed ID: 26605786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditional same-different discrimination by pigeons: acquisition and generalization to novel and few-item displays.
    Castro L; Kennedy PL; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 20141315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of hippocampal and area parahippocampalis lesions in pigeons: I. Delayed matching to sample.
    Colombo M; Swain N; Harper D; Alsop B
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1997 May; 50(2):149-71. PubMed ID: 9225621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hippocampal lesions impair performance on a conditional delayed matching and non-matching to position task in the rat.
    Sloan HL; Döbrössy M; Dunnett SB
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 171(2):240-50. PubMed ID: 16697059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Control of choice in conditional discriminations by sample-specific behaviors.
    Urcuioli PJ; Honig WK
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Jul; 6(3):251-77. PubMed ID: 7391752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pigeons prefer conditional stimuli over their absence: a comment on Roberts et al. (2009).
    Zentall TR; Stagner JP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20718554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight duration samples in pigeons.
    Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 16481126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of retention interval on performance in a numerical reproduction task.
    Tan L
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 18242005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning in the temporal bisection task: Relative or absolute?
    de Carvalho MP; Machado A; Tonneau F
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 26752233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.