184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21704725)
1. Validation of a genotoxicity test based on p53R2 gene expression in human lymphoblastoid cells.
Mizota T; Ohno K; Yamada T
Mutat Res; 2011 Sep; 724(1-2):76-85. PubMed ID: 21704725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A genotoxicity test system based on p53R2 gene expression in human cells: assessment of its reactivity to various classes of genotoxic chemicals.
Ohno K; Ishihata K; Tanaka-Azuma Y; Yamada T
Mutat Res; 2008 Oct; 656(1-2):27-35. PubMed ID: 18674635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genotoxicity test system based on p53R2 gene expression in human cells: examination with 80 chemicals.
Ohno K; Tanaka-Azuma Y; Yoneda Y; Yamada T
Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 16236544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The development of RAD51C, Cystatin A, p53 and Nrf2 luciferase-reporter assays in metabolically competent HepG2 cells for the assessment of mechanism-based genotoxicity and of oxidative stress in the early research phase of drug development.
Westerink WM; Stevenson JC; Horbach GJ; Schoonen WG
Mutat Res; 2010 Feb; 696(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 20006733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays for the rapid assessment of genotoxicity in the early research phase of drug development.
Westerink WM; Stevenson JC; Lauwers A; Griffioen G; Horbach GJ; Schoonen WG
Mutat Res; 2009 May; 676(1-2):113-30. PubMed ID: 19393335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of a human cell based high-throughput genotoxicity assay 'Anthem's Genotoxicity screen' using ECVAM recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals.
Rajakrishna L; Krishnan Unni S; Subbiah M; Sadagopan S; Nair AR; Chandrappa R; Sambasivam G; Sukumaran SK
Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Feb; 28(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 23850743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-specificity and high-sensitivity genotoxicity assessment in a human cell line: validation of the GreenScreen HC GADD45a-GFP genotoxicity assay.
Hastwell PW; Chai LL; Roberts KJ; Webster TW; Harvey JS; Rees RW; Walmsley RM
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 607(2):160-75. PubMed ID: 16781187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to assess the mutagenic potential of cosmetic products without animal tests?
Speit G
Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19379833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitive DsRed fluorescence-based reporter cell systems for genotoxicity and oxidative stress assessment.
Hendriks G; Atallah M; Raamsman M; Morolli B; van der Putten H; Jaadar H; Tijdens I; Esveldt-van Lange R; Mullenders L; van de Water B; Vrieling H
Mutat Res; 2011 May; 709-710():49-59. PubMed ID: 21382384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of the TGx-28.65 transcriptomic biomarker to classify genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells in the presence of rat liver S9.
Yauk CL; Buick JK; Williams A; Swartz CD; Recio L; Li HH; Fornace AJ; Thomson EM; Aubrecht J
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2016 May; 57(4):243-60. PubMed ID: 26946220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. GADD45a-GFP GreenScreen HC assay results for the ECVAM recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of new genotoxicity tests.
Birrell L; Cahill P; Hughes C; Tate M; Walmsley RM
Mutat Res; 2010 Jan; 695(1-2):87-95. PubMed ID: 20006735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitive detection of chemical-induced genotoxicity by the Cypridina secretory luciferase reporter assay, using DNA repair-deficient strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Ochi Y; Sugawara H; Iwami M; Tanaka M; Eki T
Yeast; 2011 Apr; 28(4):265-78. PubMed ID: 21456053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of high-throughput genotoxicity assays used in profiling the US EPA ToxCast chemicals.
Knight AW; Little S; Houck K; Dix D; Judson R; Richard A; McCarroll N; Akerman G; Yang C; Birrell L; Walmsley RM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Nov; 55(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 19591892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transcriptional responses to ionizing radiation reveal that p53R2 protects against radiation-induced mutagenesis in human lymphoblastoid cells.
Tsai MH; Chen X; Chandramouli GV; Chen Y; Yan H; Zhao S; Keng P; Liber HL; Coleman CN; Mitchell JB; Chuang EY
Oncogene; 2006 Jan; 25(4):622-32. PubMed ID: 16247478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a highthroughput yeast-based assay for detection of metabolically activated genotoxins.
Liu X; Kramer JA; Swaffield JC; Hu Y; Chai G; Wilson AG
Mutat Res; 2008 May; 653(1-2):63-9. PubMed ID: 18485802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of a novel keratinocyte-based reporter cell line to screen skin sensitizers in vitro.
Emter R; Ellis G; Natsch A
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Jun; 245(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 20307559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduction of misleading ("false") positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. I. Choice of cell type.
Fowler P; Smith K; Young J; Jeffrey L; Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Carmichael P
Mutat Res; 2012 Feb; 742(1-2):11-25. PubMed ID: 22138618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
