182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21704789)
1. Validity, responsiveness, and clinically important difference of the ABILHAND questionnaire in patients with stroke.
Wang TN; Lin KC; Wu CY; Chung CY; Pei YC; Teng YK
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Jul; 92(7):1086-91. PubMed ID: 21704789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of predictive validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of arm accelerometer in real-world activity of patients with chronic stroke.
Chen HL; Lin KC; Hsieh YW; Wu CY; Liing RJ; Chen CL
Clin Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 32(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 28580791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients with improved performance after stroke rehabilitation.
Wu CY; Chuang LL; Lin KC; Lee SD; Hong WH
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Aug; 92(8):1281-7. PubMed ID: 21807147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test-retest reliability of the ABILHAND questionnaire in persons with chronic stroke.
Ekstrand E; Lindgren I; Lexell J; Brogårdh C
PM R; 2014 Apr; 6(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 24113290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of manual ability in stroke patients in Benin: cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the ABILHAND-Stroke questionnaire.
Niama Natta DD; Batcho CS; Stoquart GG; Alagnidé E; Kpadonou T; Lejeune TM
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 Feb; 55(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 30160434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation.
Hsieh YW; Wu CY; Lin KC; Chang YF; Chen CL; Liu JS
Stroke; 2009 Apr; 40(4):1386-91. PubMed ID: 19228851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsiveness and construct validity of two outcome measures of bilateral upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke.
Tsai HT; Lau HY; Lin KC; Li YC; Lin CJ; Yao G; Lee YY; Chen WS; Chen CL; Chang YJ; Horng YS
Front Neurol; 2024; 15():1352365. PubMed ID: 38846043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
Wu CY; Huang PC; Chen YT; Lin KC; Yang HW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Jun; 94(6):1023-30. PubMed ID: 23419791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-cultural validity of the Brazilian version of the ABILHAND questionnaire for chronic stroke individuals, based on Rasch analysis.
Basílio ML; de Faria-Fortini I; Magalhães Lde C; de Assumpção FS; de Carvalho AC; Teixeira-Salmela LF
J Rehabil Med; 2016 Jan; 48(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 26660946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a short version of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale in patients receiving rehabilitation.
Chen HF; Wu CY; Lin KC; Li MW; Yu HW
J Rehabil Med; 2012 Jul; 44(8):629-36. PubMed ID: 22729789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Responsiveness and validity of two outcome measures of instrumental activities of daily living in stroke survivors receiving rehabilitative therapies.
Wu CY; Chuang LL; Lin KC; Horng YS
Clin Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 25(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 21059664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the long form of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale more responsive than the short form in patients with stroke?
Chen KL; Chen CT; Chou YT; Shih CL; Koh CL; Hsieh CL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 May; 95(5):941-9. PubMed ID: 24491466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement scale in acute rehabilitation: a comparison with the functional independence measure and stroke impact scale-16.
Ward I; Pivko S; Brooks G; Parkin K
PM R; 2011 Nov; 3(11):1013-21. PubMed ID: 22108228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rasch validation and predictive validity of the action research arm test in patients receiving stroke rehabilitation.
Chen HF; Lin KC; Wu CY; Chen CL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 93(6):1039-45. PubMed ID: 22420887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke.
Lin JH; Hsu MJ; Sheu CF; Wu TS; Lin RT; Chen CH; Hsieh CL
Phys Ther; 2009 Aug; 89(8):840-50. PubMed ID: 19556333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Test-retest reliability and validity of the comprehensive activities of daily living measure in patients with stroke.
Hsueh IP; Wang CH; Liou TH; Lin CH; Hsieh CL
J Rehabil Med; 2012 Jul; 44(8):637-41. PubMed ID: 22729790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation.
Lin KC; Chuang LL; Wu CY; Hsieh YW; Chang WY
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010; 47(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 20848369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
Liao WW; Wu CY; Hsieh YW; Lin KC; Chang WY
Clin Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 26(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 21840917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychometric comparison of the shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke rehabilitation.
Fu TS; Wu CY; Lin KC; Hsieh CJ; Liu JS; Wang TN; Ou-Yang P
Clin Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 26(11):1043-7. PubMed ID: 22180444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ability of three motor measures to predict functional outcomes reported by stroke patients after rehabilitation.
Li KY; Lin KC; Wang TN; Wu CY; Huang YH; Ouyang P
NeuroRehabilitation; 2012; 30(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 22672940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
