126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21704959)
1. Divided attention interferes with fulfilling activity-based intentions.
Brewer GA; Ball BH; Knight JB; Dewitt MR; Marsh RL
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 21704959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation-intention encoding in a prospective memory task enhances spontaneous retrieval of intentions.
Rummel J; Einstein GO; Rampey H
Memory; 2012; 20(8):803-17. PubMed ID: 22897132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential involvement of regions of rostral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 10) in time- and event-based prospective memory.
Okuda J; Fujii T; Ohtake H; Tsukiura T; Yamadori A; Frith CD; Burgess PW
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jun; 64(3):233-46. PubMed ID: 17126435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The failure of deactivating intentions: aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm.
Walser M; Fischer R; Goschke T
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 22288817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: the importance of associative cueing.
Nowinski JL; Dismukes KR
Memory; 2005 Aug; 13(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 16076678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the role of imagery in event-based prospective memory.
Brewer GA; Knight J; Meeks JT; Marsh RL
Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):901-7. PubMed ID: 21602060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gone but not forgotten: the effects of cancelled intentions on the neural correlates of prospective memory.
West R; McNerney MW; Travers S
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jun; 64(3):215-25. PubMed ID: 17107728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting event-based prospective memory cues occurring within and outside the focus of attention.
Hicks JL; Cook GI; Marsh RL
Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15822607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time-based and event-based prospective memory across adulthood: underlying mechanisms and differential costs on the ongoing task.
Jäger T; Kliegel M
J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):4-22. PubMed ID: 18318405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring students' prospective memory inside and outside the lab.
Kim PY; Mayhorn CB
Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):241-54. PubMed ID: 18510135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The specificity of prospective memory costs.
Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Hirschhorn E; Sobin Y; Gollwitzer PM
Memory; 2012; 20(8):848-64. PubMed ID: 22900905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of age, enactment, and cue-action relatedness on memory for intentions in the Virtual Week task.
Pereira A; Ellis JA; Freeman JE
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2012 Sep; 19(5):549-65. PubMed ID: 22221208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The valence of event-based prospective memory cues or the context in which they occur affects their detection.
Clark-Foos A; Brewer GA; Marsh RL; Meeks JT; Cook GI
Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 19353934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intention formation induces episodic inhibition of distracting stimuli.
Veling H; van Knippenberg A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 17991450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid.
Einstein GO; McDaniel MA; Williford CL; Pagan JL; Dismukes RK
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2003 Sep; 9(3):147-62. PubMed ID: 14570509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.
Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Cook GI; Hansen JS; Pallos AL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):861-70. PubMed ID: 14516219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural basis for successful encoding and retrieval of prospective memory.
Chen Y; Guo C; Jiang Y
Sci China Life Sci; 2011 Jun; 54(6):580-7. PubMed ID: 21706420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective memory and task interference in a continuous monitoring dynamic display task.
Loft S; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Jun; 16(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 20565199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study.
Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks.
Kliegel M; Martin M; McDaniel MA; Einstein GO
Memory; 2004 Sep; 12(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 15615314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
