196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21705257)
1. The effect of motion patterns on edge-loading of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
Mellon SJ; Kwon YM; Glyn-Jones S; Murray DW; Gill HS
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Dec; 33(10):1212-20. PubMed ID: 21705257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Mellon SJ; Grammatopoulos G; Andersen MS; Pandit HG; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 25482661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual motion patterns during gait and sit-to-stand contribute to edge-loading risk in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
Mellon SJ; Grammatopoulos G; Andersen MS; Pegg EC; Pandit HG; Murray DW; Gill HS
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):799-810. PubMed ID: 23636762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimized design for a novel acetabular component with three wings. A study of finite element analysis.
Ma W; Zhang X; Wang J; Zhang Q; Chen W; Zhang Y
J Surg Res; 2013 Jan; 179(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 22995660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Asymmetrical hip loading correlates with metal ion levels in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing during sit-to-stand.
Mellon S; Grammatopoulos G; Pandit H; Murray DW; Gill HS
Hip Int; 2014; 24(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 24474415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement.
De Haan R; Pattyn C; Gill HS; Murray DW; Campbell PA; De Smet K
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Oct; 90(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 18827237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A safe zone for acetabular component position in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: winner of the 2012 HAP PAUL award.
Liu F; Gross TP
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Aug; 28(7):1224-30. PubMed ID: 23540536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo evaluation of edge-loading in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients with pseudotumours.
Kwon YM; Mellon SJ; Monk P; Murray DW; Gill HS
Bone Joint Res; 2012 Apr; 1(4):42-9. PubMed ID: 23610670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Study of micromotion in modular acetabular components during gait and subluxation: a finite element investigation.
Amirouche F; Romero F; Gonzalez M; Aram L
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021002. PubMed ID: 18412489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of acetabular cup rim design on the contact stress during edge loading in ceramic-on-ceramic hip prostheses.
Mak M; Jin Z; Fisher J; Stewart TD
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jan; 26(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 20149581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The initial stability and contact mechanics of a press-fit resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
Udofia I; Liu F; Jin Z; Roberts P; Grigoris P
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Apr; 89(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 17463130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of 3D physiological loading and motion on elastohydrodynamic lubrication of metal-on-metal total hip replacements.
Gao L; Wang F; Yang P; Jin Z
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jul; 31(6):720-9. PubMed ID: 19269879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties.
Langton DJ; Sprowson AP; Joyce TJ; Reed M; Carluke I; Partington P; Nargol AV
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Oct; 91(10):1287-95. PubMed ID: 19794161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gait alterations can reduce the risk of edge loading.
Wesseling M; Meyer C; De Groote F; Corten K; Simon JP; Desloovere K; Jonkers I
J Orthop Res; 2016 Jun; 34(6):1069-76. PubMed ID: 26632197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subject-specific hip geometry affects predicted hip joint contact forces during gait.
Lenaerts G; De Groote F; Demeulenaere B; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Spaepen A; Jonkers I
J Biomech; 2008; 41(6):1243-52. PubMed ID: 18346745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do gait adaptations during stair climbing result in changes in implant forces in subjects with total hip replacements compared to normal subjects?
Foucher KC; Hurwitz DE; Wimmer MA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Jul; 23(6):754-61. PubMed ID: 18433952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrieval analysis of 240 metal-on-metal hip components, comparing modular total hip replacement with hip resurfacing.
Matthies A; Underwood R; Cann P; Ilo K; Nawaz Z; Skinner J; Hart AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Mar; 93(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 21357950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aberrant pelvis and hip kinematics impair hip loading before and after total hip replacement.
Lenaerts G; Mulier M; Spaepen A; Van der Perre G; Jonkers I
Gait Posture; 2009 Oct; 30(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 19560359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring functional outcome after total hip replacement with subject-specific hip joint loading.
Weber T; Dendorfer S; Dullien S; Grifka J; Verkerke GJ; Renkawitz T
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Dec; 226(12):939-46. PubMed ID: 23636957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
