These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21707129)

  • 1. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of deception judgments.
    Bond CF; DePaulo BM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception.
    Vrij A; Hartwig M; Granhag PA
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():295-317. PubMed ID: 30609913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deception detection from written accounts.
    Masip J; Bethencourt M; Lucas G; Sánchez-San Segundo M; Herrero C
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22221194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Home runs and humbugs: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008).
    O'Sullivan M
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):493-7; discussion 501-3. PubMed ID: 18605815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: the boy-who-cried-wolf effect.
    O'Sullivan M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1316-27. PubMed ID: 15189591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.
    Reinhard MA; Sporer SL; Scharmach M; Marksteiner T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 21707196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are lies more wrong than errors? Accuracy judgments of inaccurate statements.
    Teigen KH; Filkuková P
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 21054418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of affective states on the process of lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Schwarz N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 23148455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies.
    Mann S; Vrij A; Bull R
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):137-49. PubMed ID: 14769126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unconscious processes improve lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Greifeneder R; Scharmach M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):721-39. PubMed ID: 24219784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some evidence for unconscious lie detection.
    Ten Brinke L; Stimson D; Carney DR
    Psychol Sci; 2014 May; 25(5):1098-105. PubMed ID: 24659190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception.
    Hauch V; Blandón-Gitlin I; Masip J; Sporer SL
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Nov; 19(4):307-42. PubMed ID: 25387767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subjective cues to deception/honesty in a high stakes situation: an exploratory approach.
    Wright Whelan C; Wagstaff GF; Wheatcroft JM
    J Psychol; 2015; 149(5):517-34. PubMed ID: 25975577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The dual lens model: a comprehensive framework for understanding self-other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance.
    Hirschmüller S; Egloff B; Nestler S; Back MD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):335-53. PubMed ID: 23046068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting true and false opinions: The Devil's Advocate approach as a lie detection aid.
    Leal S; Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 20398882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can Ordinary People Detect Deception After All?
    Ten Brinke L; Vohs KD; Carney DR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 20(8):579-588. PubMed ID: 27353575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.