These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21707129)

  • 41. It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.
    Law MKH; Jackson SA; Aidman E; Geiger M; Olderbak S; Kleitman S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196384. PubMed ID: 29723243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The ease of lying.
    Verschuere B; Spruyt A; Meijer EH; Otgaar H
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):908-11. PubMed ID: 21093302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.
    Langleben DD; Loughead JW; Bilker WB; Ruparel K; Childress AR; Busch SI; Gur RC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Dec; 26(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 16161128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The accuracy of auditors' and layered voice Analysis (LVA) operators' judgments of truth and deception during police questioning.
    Horvath F; McCloughan J; Weatherman D; Slowik S
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 23406506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. You must be lying because I don't understand you: Language proficiency and lie detection.
    Elliott E; Leach AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Dec; 22(4):488-499. PubMed ID: 27936858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An object cue is more effective than a word in ERP-based detection of deception.
    Cutmore TR; Djakovic T; Kebbell MR; Shum DH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Mar; 71(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 18789361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Hemispheric asymmetry and deception detection.
    Malcolm S; Paul Keenan J
    Laterality; 2005 Mar; 10(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 15849029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effects of a model statement on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jun; 207():103080. PubMed ID: 32413731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Detecting children's lies: comparing true accounts about highly stressful injuries with unprepared, prepared, and coached lies.
    Warren KL; Dodd E; Raynor G; Peterson C
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):329-41. PubMed ID: 22566366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Guidance to detect deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales: are verbal content cues useful to detect false accusations?
    Sporer SL; Masip J; Cramer M
    Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 24720096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Detecting deception in facial expressions of pain: accuracy and training.
    Hill ML; Craig KD
    Clin J Pain; 2004; 20(6):415-22. PubMed ID: 15502685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Limits of Conscious Deception Detection: When Reliance on False Deception Cues Contributes to Inaccurate Judgments.
    Stel M; Schwarz A; van Dijk E; van Knippenberg A
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1331. PubMed ID: 32636787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Lie prevalence, lie characteristics and strategies of self-reported good liars.
    Verigin BL; Meijer EH; Bogaard G; Vrij A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225566. PubMed ID: 31794563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Unraveling the Misconception About Deception and Nervous Behavior.
    Vrij A; Fisher RP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1377. PubMed ID: 32625154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Thirty-site P300 scalp distribution, amplitude variance across sites, and amplitude in detection of deceptive concealment of multiple guilty items.
    Lui MA; Rosenfeld JP; Ryan AH
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):491-509. PubMed ID: 18633836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Do people detect deception the way they think they do? Replication and extensions.
    Sánchez N; Masip J
    Psicothema; 2020 Aug; 32(3):329-336. PubMed ID: 32711667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Insurance based lie detection: Enhancing the verifiability approach with a model statement component.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Lafferty M; Nahari G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():1-8. PubMed ID: 28088655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Determinants of linear judgment: a meta-analysis of lens model studies.
    Karelaia N; Hogarth RM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 134(3):404-26. PubMed ID: 18444703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Decisions among time saving options: when intuition is strong and wrong.
    Svenson O
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 17936234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?
    Caso L; Cavagnis L; Vrij A; Palena N
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1128194. PubMed ID: 37179853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.