248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21707196)
1. Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.
Reinhard MA; Sporer SL; Scharmach M; Marksteiner T
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 21707196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of affective states on the process of lie detection.
Reinhard MA; Schwarz N
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 23148455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving accuracy of veracity judgment through cue training.
Santarcangelo M; Cribbie RA; Hubbard AS
Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Jun; 98(3 Pt 1):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15209321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deception detection from written accounts.
Masip J; Bethencourt M; Lucas G; Sánchez-San Segundo M; Herrero C
Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22221194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
Hartwig M; Bond CF
Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
Bond CF; Depaulo BM
Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge.
Street CN; Richardson DC
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):342-55. PubMed ID: 26301728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments.
Moons WG; Mackie DM; Garcia-Marques T
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 19210062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidance to detect deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales: are verbal content cues useful to detect false accusations?
Sporer SL; Masip J; Cramer M
Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 24720096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Word frequency, familiarity, and laterality effects in a dichotic listening task.
Techentin C; Voyer D
Laterality; 2011 May; 16(3):313-32. PubMed ID: 20665334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies.
Mann S; Vrij A; Bull R
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):137-49. PubMed ID: 14769126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of deception judgments.
Bond CF; DePaulo BM
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fast and frugal framing effects?
McCloy R; Beaman CP; Frosch CA; Goddard K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1043-52. PubMed ID: 20565220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positivity can cue familiarity.
Garcia-Marques T; Mackie DM; Claypool HM; Garcia-Marques L
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 May; 30(5):585-93. PubMed ID: 15107158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: the boy-who-cried-wolf effect.
O'Sullivan M
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1316-27. PubMed ID: 15189591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy.
Tussing AA; Greene RL
Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 11258228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing.
Koriat A; Levy-Sadot R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):34-53. PubMed ID: 11204106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
