These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21707210)

  • 21. Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese.
    Zhang Y; Yu J; Boland JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):765-81. PubMed ID: 20438271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Situated sentence processing: the coordinated interplay account and a neurobehavioral model.
    Crocker MW; Knoeferle P; Mayberry MR
    Brain Lang; 2010 Mar; 112(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 19450874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Processing the in the parafovea: are articles skipped automatically?
    Angele B; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):649-62. PubMed ID: 22799285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Matrix Verb as a Source of Comprehension Difficulty in Object Relative Sentences.
    Staub A; Dillon B; Clifton C
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1353-1376. PubMed ID: 27813146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures.
    Christianson K; Luke SG; Hussey EK; Wochna KL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1380-1405. PubMed ID: 27150840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimization of dependency length in written English.
    Temperley D
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):300-33. PubMed ID: 17074312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies.
    Phillips C; Kazanina N; Abada SH
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):407-28. PubMed ID: 15722211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Processing motion implied in language: eye-movement differences during aspect comprehension.
    Huette S; Winter B; Matlock T; Spivey M
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1():S193-7. PubMed ID: 22915260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.
    Chen B; Ning A; Bi H; Dunlap S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18538740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context.
    Van Assche E; Duyck W; Hartsuiker RJ; Diependaele K
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Aug; 20(8):923-7. PubMed ID: 19549082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or.
    Staub A; Clifton C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):425-36. PubMed ID: 16569157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Going the distance: Memory and control processes in active dependency construction.
    Wagers MW; Phillips C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1274-304. PubMed ID: 24320939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interaction of language and visual attention: evidence from production and comprehension.
    Mishra RK
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():277-92. PubMed ID: 19733763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
    Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: evidence from eye tracking.
    Guerra E; Knoeferle P
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):535-52. PubMed ID: 25215930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phonological typicality and sentence processing.
    Tanenhaus MK; Hare M
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 17207653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Influence of Globally Ungrammatical Local Syntactic Constraints on Real-Time Sentence Comprehension: Evidence From the Visual World Paradigm and Reading.
    Kamide Y; Kukona A
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):2976-2998. PubMed ID: 30341784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Syntactic flexibility and competition in sentence production: the case of English and Russian.
    Myachykov A; Scheepers C; Garrod S; Thompson D; Fedorova O
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Aug; 66(8):1601-19. PubMed ID: 23286507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.