These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21707220)

  • 1. The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching.
    Dreisbach G; Wenke D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1540-6. PubMed ID: 21707220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The shielding function of task rules in the context of task switching.
    Reisenauer R; Dreisbach G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):358-76. PubMed ID: 23805948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings.
    Schneider DW; Verbruggen F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1629-40. PubMed ID: 18609408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: Developmental change in between-trial control adjustments.
    Huizinga M; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Mar; 108(3):484-503. PubMed ID: 21092983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptive control of response preparedness in task switching.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R; Druey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1826-35. PubMed ID: 19428414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological correlates of task conflicts in task-switching.
    Hsieh S; Liu H
    Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 1203():116-25. PubMed ID: 18314093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More attention to attention? An eye-tracking investigation of selection of perceptual attributes during a task switch.
    Longman CS; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1142-51. PubMed ID: 23088543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamics of task sets: evidence from dense-array event-related potentials.
    Poulsen C; Luu P; Davey C; Tucker DM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):133-54. PubMed ID: 15922166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The origin of switch costs: task preparation or task application?
    Los SA; Van der Burg E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1895-915. PubMed ID: 20401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-set switching deficits in early-stage Huntington's disease: implications for basal ganglia function.
    Aron AR; Watkins L; Sahakian BJ; Monsell S; Barker RA; Robbins TW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):629-42. PubMed ID: 12965037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal distinctiveness and repetition benefits in task switching: disentangling stimulus-related and response-related contributions.
    Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):434-46. PubMed ID: 20680886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppression.
    Meiran N; Hsieh S; Dimov E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):992-1002. PubMed ID: 20565214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To switch or not to switch: brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features.
    Hölig C; Berti S
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1345():164-75. PubMed ID: 20580694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shifting development in mid-childhood: the influence of between-task interference.
    Cragg L; Nation K
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Sep; 45(5):1465-79. PubMed ID: 19702406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditions of directed attention inhibit recognition performance for explicitly presented target-aligned irrelevant stimuli.
    Dewald AD; Sinnett S; Doumas LA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 21679910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations.
    Druey MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.