These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21708083)

  • 21. Repeatability of ARK-30 in a pediatric population.
    Hernandez-Moreno L; Vallelado-Alvarez A; Martin R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 66(9):1262-1267. PubMed ID: 30127136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Screening for refractive errors in children: accuracy of the hand held refractor Retinomax to screen for astigmatism.
    Cordonnier M; Dramaix M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1999 Feb; 83(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 10396190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the results of four different refraction measurement devices in children with retinoscopy.
    Simsek M; Oral Y; Erogul O; Sabaner MC; Simsek C; Yorukoglu S
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2022; 66(4):337-343. PubMed ID: 36589324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pediatric vision screening using the plusoptiX A12C photoscreener in Chinese preschool children aged 3 to 4 years.
    Huang D; Chen X; Zhang X; Wang Y; Zhu H; Ding H; Bai J; Chen J; Fu Z; Wang Z; Liu H
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2041. PubMed ID: 28515427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the refractive measurements with hand-held autorefractometer, table-mounted autorefractometer and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.
    Akil H; Keskin S; Çavdarli C
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 26028946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of objective refraction in darkness to cycloplegic refraction: a pilot study.
    Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ; Meehan K; Grk D; Cox M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 26888570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of different autorefractors with retinoscopy in children.
    Oral Y; Gunaydin N; Ozgur O; Arsan AK; Oskan S
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2012; 49(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 22938517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance of the Plusoptix A09 photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in Chinese children attending an eye clinic.
    Yan XR; Jiao WZ; Li ZW; Xu WW; Li FJ; Wang LH
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0126052. PubMed ID: 26030210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of noncycloplegic refraction in primary school children in southern Thailand.
    Funarunart P; Tengtrisorn S; Sangsupawanich P; Siangyai P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 19530586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intra- and inter- examiner repeatability of cycloplegic retinoscopy among young children.
    McCullough SJ; Doyle L; Saunders KJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 28030881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of cycloplegia on the measurement of refractive error in Chinese children.
    Li T; Zhou X; Zhu J; Tang X; Gu X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 30136309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of 2Win and plusoptiX A12R refractometers with Retinomax handheld autorefractor keratometer.
    Racano E; Alessi S; Pertile R
    J AAPOS; 2019 Oct; 23(5):276.e1-276.e5. PubMed ID: 31539614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of plusoptiX S04 photoscreener as a vision screening tool in children with intellectual disability.
    Ugurbas SC; Alpay A; Tutar H; Sagdik HM; Ugurbas SH
    J AAPOS; 2011 Oct; 15(5):476-9. PubMed ID: 22108360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accomodative tone in children under general anesthesia.
    Salchow DJ; Marcus I; Golembeski TJ; Wang X; Li F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 156(5):1034-1039.e2. PubMed ID: 23972304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Autorefraction and Photorefraction with and without Cycloplegia Using 1% Tropicamide in Preschool Children.
    Yassa ET; Ünlü C
    J Ophthalmol; 2019; 2019():1487013. PubMed ID: 31191991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spot Refractive Screening With or Without Maximum Atropine Cycloplegia in Preschool Chinese Children.
    Liu X; Feng J; Wang L; Tong H; Chen W
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2021; 58(3):146-153. PubMed ID: 34039157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of cycloplegia in objective refraction.
    Jorge J; Queiros A; González-Méijome J; Fernandes P; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 15953119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Accuracy of two autorefractors--Pediatric Autorefractor plusoptiX and Retinomax--in cycloplegic children in comparison to retinoscopy].
    Schmidt-Bacher AE; Kahlert C; Kolling G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2010 Oct; 227(10):792-7. PubMed ID: 20963682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Noncycloplegic photorefractive screening in pre-school children with the "PowerRefractor" in a pediatric practice.
    Schaeffel F; Mathis U; Brüggemann G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):630-9. PubMed ID: 17632312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Comparison of Three Different Photoscreeners in Children.
    Teberik K; Eski MT; Kaya M; Ankarali H
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2018 Sep; 55(5):306-311. PubMed ID: 29809264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.