These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21709795)

  • 21. Regression to the Mean Mimicking Changes in Sexual Arousal to Child Stimuli in Pedophiles.
    Mokros A; Habermeyer E
    Arch Sex Behav; 2016 Oct; 45(7):1863-7. PubMed ID: 26585168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders.
    Blanchard R; Klassen P; Dickey R; Kuban ME; Blak T
    Psychol Assess; 2001 Mar; 13(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 11281033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measuring Pedophilic Sexual Interest.
    Carvalho J; Bradford J; Murphy L; Briken P; Fedoroff P
    J Sex Med; 2020 Mar; 17(3):378-392. PubMed ID: 31932255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The screening scale for pedophilic interests predicts recidivism among adult sex offenders with child victims.
    Seto MC; Harris GT; Rice ME; Barbaree HE
    Arch Sex Behav; 2004 Oct; 33(5):455-66. PubMed ID: 15305116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Construct validity of the Violence Risk Scale--Sexual Offender Version for measuring sexual deviance.
    Canales DD; Olver ME; Wong SC
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Dec; 21(4):474-92. PubMed ID: 19901240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Report from the Committee on Sex Offenders: the Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest--a brief description.
    Krueger RB; Bradford JM; Glancy GD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 9664263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The plethysmograph reconsidered: comments on Barker and Howell.
    Simon WT; Schouten PG
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 8054680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validity of physiological measures of pedophilic sexual arousal in a sexual offender population: a critique of Hall, Proctor, and Nelson.
    Quinsey VL; Laws DR
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1990 Dec; 58(6):886-91. PubMed ID: 2292642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Faking sexual preference.
    Kaine A; Crim M; Mersereau G
    Can J Psychiatry; 1988 Jun; 33(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 3409155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Discriminative and predictive validity of the penile plethysmograph in adolescent sex offenders.
    Clift RJ; Rajlic G; Gretton HM
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Sep; 21(3):335-62. PubMed ID: 19587382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of objective measures of sexual arousal and interest: visual reaction time and penile plethysmography.
    Letourneau EJ
    Sex Abuse; 2002 Jul; 14(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 12087683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measuring sexual arousal.
    Lawson L
    J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2000 Aug; 38(8):12-8. PubMed ID: 10959471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validity and ethics of penile circumference measures of sexual arousal: a critical review.
    McConaghy N
    Arch Sex Behav; 1989 Aug; 18(4):357-69. PubMed ID: 2673137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Erotic gender differentiation in pedophilia.
    Freund K; Watson R; Dickey R; Rienzo D
    Arch Sex Behav; 1991 Dec; 20(6):555-66. PubMed ID: 1768222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Causal attributions for criminal offending and sexual arousal: comparison of child sex offenders with other offenders.
    McKay MM; Chapman JW; Long NR
    Br J Clin Psychol; 1996 Feb; 35(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 8673036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patterns of sexual arousal of accused child molesters involved in custody disputes.
    McAnulty RD; Adams HE
    Arch Sex Behav; 1990 Dec; 19(6):541-56. PubMed ID: 2082859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The validity of phallometric assessment with rapists: comments on Looman & Marshall (2005).
    Lalumière ML; Rice ME
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Mar; 19(1):61-8; Discussion 69-72. PubMed ID: 17235702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sexual preference assessment of sexual aggressors.
    Proulx J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1989; 12(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 2635156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The strength of sexual arousal as a function of the age of the sex offender: comparisons among pedophiles, hebephiles, and teleiophiles.
    Blanchard R; Barbaree HE
    Sex Abuse; 2005 Oct; 17(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 16341604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multiple indicators of sexual interest in prepubescent or pubescent children as predictors of sexual recidivism.
    Stephens S; Cantor JM; Goodwill AM; Seto MC
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2017 Jun; 85(6):585-595. PubMed ID: 28287801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.