These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21710882)

  • 1. Evaluation of facial asymmetry with three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kook YA; Kim Y
    J Clin Orthod; 2011 Feb; 45(2):112-5; quiz 92. PubMed ID: 21710882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic.
    Cattaneo PM; Melsen B
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 18834009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.
    Swennen GR; Schutyser F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 16979502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits of Sirona's ORTHOPHOS XG 3D system extend far beyond implantology.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):784. PubMed ID: 25742682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics.
    Patel S; Horner K
    Int Endod J; 2009 Sep; 42(9):755-6. PubMed ID: 19712194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical applications of digital 2-D and 3-D radiography for the periodontist.
    Eshraghi T; McAllister N; McAllister B
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):36-45. PubMed ID: 23040338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
    de Moraes ME; Hollender LG; Chen CS; Moraes LC; Balducci I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three dimensional computed technology--a new standard of care.
    Tipton WL; Metz P
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2008; 19(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 18512657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Sanders DA; Rigali PH; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics Joint Position Statement of the American Association of Endodontists and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.
    ;
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 21237439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evolution of cephalometric diagnosis in orthodontics.
    da Silva MB; Sant'Anna EF
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(3):63-71. PubMed ID: 24094013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Getting ahead: "Real-world" technologies give dental school grads an edge.
    DiVito R
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):788. PubMed ID: 25742685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography-based virtual treatment planning and fabrication of a surgical splint for asymmetric patients: surgery first approach.
    Uribe F; Janakiraman N; Shafer D; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):748-58. PubMed ID: 24182591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Lee H; Bayome M; Kim SH; Kim KB; Behrents RG; Kook YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 22858326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of vertical root fractures by using cone beam computed tomography with variable voxel sizes in an in vitro model.
    Özer SY
    J Endod; 2011 Jan; 37(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 21146082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional treatment planning and management of an asymmetrical skeletal Class III malocclusion and open bite.
    Krishnaswamy NR; Varghese BT; Faizee SH; Jayakumar G; Anand MK
    J Clin Orthod; 2014 Jan; 48(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 24622624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary yaw as the primary predictor of maxillary dental midline deviation: 3D analysis using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Song WW; Kim SS; Sándor GK; Kim YD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 71(4):752-62. PubMed ID: 23010372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cone beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of dental disease.
    Tetradis S; Anstey P; Graff-Radford S
    Tex Dent J; 2011 Jul; 128(7):620-8. PubMed ID: 21928738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of dento-maxillofacial cone beam X-ray computed tomography system.
    Yamamoto K; Ueno K; Seo K; Shinohara D
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003; 6 Suppl 1():160-2. PubMed ID: 14606550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
    Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.