These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21712109)
21. Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (4). Kalso E; Edwards J; McQuay HJ; Moore RA Eur J Pain; 2002; 6(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 11888232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias. Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Harbord RM; Egger M; Sterne JA Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3443-57. PubMed ID: 16345038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis: incorporating the degree of interdependence. Cheung SF; Chan DK J Appl Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(5):780-91. PubMed ID: 15506860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research. Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed responses. Hartung J; Knapp G Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(12):1771-82. PubMed ID: 11406840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Rosenberg MS Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):464-8. PubMed ID: 15807430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantifying accuracy improvement in sets of pooled judgments: does dialectical bootstrapping work? White CM; Antonakis J Psychol Sci; 2013 Jan; 24(1):115-6. PubMed ID: 23196638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data. Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Asymmetry detected in funnel plot was probably due to true heterogeneity. Stuck AE; Rubenstein LZ; Wieland D BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):469; author reply 470-1. PubMed ID: 9492685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Meta-analysis. Pocock S Stat Methods Med Res; 1993; 2(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 8261253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies require study by study examination: first for heterogeneity, and then for sources of heterogeneity. Begg CB J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):865-6. PubMed ID: 16085189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Improved Fisher z estimators for univariate random-effects meta-analysis of correlations. Hafdahl AR Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):233-61. PubMed ID: 18257972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Thompson SG; Higgins JP Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1559-73. PubMed ID: 12111920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials. Baujat B; Mahé C; Pignon JP; Hill C Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2641-52. PubMed ID: 12228882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials. III: The issue of carry-over. Curtin F; Elbourne D; Altman DG Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2161-73. PubMed ID: 12210631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]