These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21712463)
1. Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf and hard-of-hearing students: past, present, and future. Qi S; Mitchell RE J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 21712463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National survey of accommodations and alternate assessments for students who are deaf or hard of hearing in the United States. Cawthon SW J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2006; 11(3):337-59. PubMed ID: 16648458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accommodations use for statewide standardized assessments: prevalence and recommendations for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Cawthon SW; J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2008; 13(1):55-76. PubMed ID: 17584994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Print exposure, reading habits, and reading achievement among deaf and hearing college students. Marschark M; Sarchet T; Convertino CM; Borgna G; Morrison C; Remelt S J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 22025672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Personal factors that influence deaf college students' academic success. Albertini JA; Kelly RR; Matchett MK J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(1):85-101. PubMed ID: 21558157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of American Sign Language as an assessment accommodation for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Cawthon SW; Winton SM; Garberoglio CL; Gobble ME J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2011; 16(2):198-211. PubMed ID: 21135410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Academic status and progress of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in general education classrooms. Antia SD; Jones PB; Reed S; Kreimeyer KH J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(3):293-311. PubMed ID: 19502625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and reliability of the classroom participation questionnaire with deaf and hard of hearing students in public schools. Antia SD; Sabers DL; Stinson MS J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2007; 12(2):158-71. PubMed ID: 17114595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigating the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measurement in written expression for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Cheng SF; Rose S J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(4):503-15. PubMed ID: 19564174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Academic status of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in public schools: student, home, and service facilitators and detractors. Reed S; Antia SD; Kreimeyer KH J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2008; 13(4):485-502. PubMed ID: 18344539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When parents are deaf versus hard of hearing: patterns of sign use and school placement of deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Mitchell RE; Karchmer MA J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2004; 9(2):133-52. PubMed ID: 15304437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "I was born full deaf." Written language outcomes after 1 year of strategic and interactive writing instruction. Wolbers KA; Dostal HM; Bowers LM J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 21571902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alternate assessment use with students who are deaf or hard of hearing: an exploratory mixed-methods analysis of portfolio, checklists, and out-of-level test formats. Cawthon SW; Wurtz KA J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(2):155-77. PubMed ID: 18650221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National Norming and Performance Standards for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students. Traxler CB J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2000; 5(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 15454499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using miscue analysis to assess comprehension in deaf college readers. Albertini J; Mayer C J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2011; 16(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 20488871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From the Margins to the Spotlight: Diverse Deaf and Hard of Hearing Student Populations and Standardized Assessment Accessibility. Cawthon S Am Ann Deaf; 2015; 160(4):385-94. PubMed ID: 26497076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The appropriateness of the NC state-mandated reading competency test for deaf students as a criterion for high school graduation. Lollis J; LaSasso C J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(1):76-98. PubMed ID: 18535301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An investigation of two-way text messaging use with deaf students at the secondary level. Akamatsu CT; Mayer C; Farrelly S J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2006; 11(1):120-31. PubMed ID: 16237186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Science and evidence of success: two emerging issues in assessment accommodations for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Cawthon SW J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2010; 15(2):185-203. PubMed ID: 20147421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]