BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

961 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21712506)

  • 1. Activated partial thromboplastin time versus antifactor Xa heparin assay in monitoring unfractionated heparin by continuous intravenous infusion.
    Guervil DJ; Rosenberg AF; Winterstein AG; Harris NS; Johns TE; Zumberg MS
    Ann Pharmacother; 2011 Jul; 45(7-8):861-8. PubMed ID: 21712506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative trial of anti-factor Xa levels versus the activated partial thromboplastin time for heparin monitoring.
    Vandiver JW; Vondracek TG
    Hosp Pract (1995); 2013 Apr; 41(2):16-24. PubMed ID: 23545756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antifactor Xa levels versus activated partial thromboplastin time for monitoring unfractionated heparin.
    Vandiver JW; Vondracek TG
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jun; 32(6):546-58. PubMed ID: 22531940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antifactor Xa levels vs. activated partial thromboplastin time for monitoring unfractionated heparin. A pilot study.
    Samuel S; Allison TA; Sharaf S; Yau G; Ranjbar G; Mckaig N; Nguyen A; Escobar M; Choi HA
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2016 Oct; 41(5):499-502. PubMed ID: 27381025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discordant aPTT and anti-Xa values and outcomes in hospitalized patients treated with intravenous unfractionated heparin.
    Price EA; Jin J; Nguyen HM; Krishnan G; Bowen R; Zehnder JL
    Ann Pharmacother; 2013 Feb; 47(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 23386070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of unfractionated heparin protocols using antifactor Xa monitoring or activated partial thrombin time monitoring.
    Frugé KS; Lee YR
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2015 Sep; 72(17 Suppl 2):S90-7. PubMed ID: 26272899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized trial comparing activated thromboplastin time with heparin assay in patients with acute venous thromboembolism requiring large daily doses of heparin.
    Levine MN; Hirsh J; Gent M; Turpie AG; Cruickshank M; Weitz J; Anderson D; Johnson M
    Arch Intern Med; 1994 Jan; 154(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 8267489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring heparin anticoagulation in the acute phase response.
    Uprichard J; Manning RA; Laffan MA
    Br J Haematol; 2010 May; 149(4):613-9. PubMed ID: 20230412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of a Calculation-Free Weight-Based Unfractionated Heparin Nomogram With Anti-Xa Level Monitoring Compared With Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time.
    Kindelin NM; Anthes AM; Providence SM; Zhao X; Aspinall SL
    Ann Pharmacother; 2021 May; 55(5):575-583. PubMed ID: 32964730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Activated partial thromboplastin time and anti-xa measurements in heparin monitoring: biochemical basis for discordance.
    Takemoto CM; Streiff MB; Shermock KM; Kraus PS; Chen J; Jani J; Kickler T
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Apr; 139(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 23525615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The APTT response of pregnant plasma to unfractionated heparin.
    Chunilal SD; Young E; Johnston MA; Robertson C; Naguit I; Stevens P; Galashan D; Oskamp ML; Brennan B; Ginsberg JS
    Thromb Haemost; 2002 Jan; 87(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 11848463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Higher Maximum Doses and Infusion Rates Compared with Standard Unfractionated Heparin Therapy Are Associated with Adequate Anticoagulation without Increased Bleeding in Both Obese and Nonobese Patients with Cardiovascular Indications.
    Floroff CK; Palm NM; Steinberg DH; Powers ER; Wiggins BS
    Pharmacotherapy; 2017 Apr; 37(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 28107569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The PiCT
    Brisset AC; Ferrández A; Krause M; Rathbun S; Marlar R; Korte W
    J Thromb Haemost; 2016 Nov; 14(11):2187-2193. PubMed ID: 27582411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing Anti-Factor Xa and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Levels for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin.
    Wahking RA; Hargreaves RH; Lockwood SM; Haskell SK; Davis KW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2019 Aug; 53(8):801-805. PubMed ID: 30813751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Achieving target antifactor Xa activity with a heparin protocol based on sex, age, height, and weight.
    Rosborough TK; Shepherd MF
    Pharmacotherapy; 2004 Jun; 24(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15222660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of anti-Xa assay to monitor intravenous unfractionated heparin therapy.
    Rosenberg AF; Zumberg M; Taylor L; LeClaire A; Harris N
    J Pharm Pract; 2010 Jun; 23(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 21507816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of unfractionated heparin dose requirements to target therapeutic anti-Xa intensity during pregnancy.
    Clark NP; Delate T; Cleary SJ; Witt DM
    Thromb Res; 2010 May; 125(5):402-5. PubMed ID: 19699510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monitoring heparin therapy using activated partial thromboplastin time--results of a multicenter trial establishing the therapeutic range for SILIMAT, a reagent with high sensitivity to heparin.
    Toulon P; Boutière B; Horellou MH; Trzeciak MC; Samama MM
    Thromb Haemost; 1998 Jul; 80(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 9684794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring of unfractionated heparin in critically ill patients.
    Aarab R; van Es J; de Pont AC; Vroom MB; Middeldorp S
    Neth J Med; 2013 Nov; 71(9):466-71. PubMed ID: 24218420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of red blood cell transfusion utilization between anti-activated factor X and activated partial thromboplastin monitoring in patients receiving unfractionated heparin.
    Belk KW; Laposata M; Craver C
    J Thromb Haemost; 2016 Nov; 14(11):2148-2157. PubMed ID: 27543785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.