These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21713191)

  • 1. Assessing the usefulness of google books' word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing.
    Brysbaert M; Keuleers E; New B
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():27. PubMed ID: 21713191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles.
    Cai Q; Brysbaert M
    PLoS One; 2010 Jun; 5(6):e10729. PubMed ID: 20532192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subtitle-based word frequencies as the best estimate of reading behavior: the case of greek.
    Dimitropoulou M; Duñabeitia JA; Avilés A; Corral J; Carreiras M
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():218. PubMed ID: 21833273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English.
    van Heuven WJ; Mandera P; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1176-90. PubMed ID: 24417251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The word frequency effect: a review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German.
    Brysbaert M; Buchmeier M; Conrad M; Jacobs AM; Bölte J; Böhl A
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(5):412-24. PubMed ID: 21768069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SUBTLEX-CAT: Subtitle word frequencies and contextual diversity for Catalan.
    Boada R; Guasch M; Haro J; Demestre J; Ferré P
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Feb; 52(1):360-375. PubMed ID: 30895456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.
    Brysbaert M; New B
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):977-90. PubMed ID: 19897807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subtlex-pl: subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Polish.
    Mandera P; Keuleers E; Wodniecka Z; Brysbaert M
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):471-83. PubMed ID: 24942246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the advantages of word frequency and contextual diversity measures extracted from subtitles: The case of Portuguese.
    Soares AP; Machado J; Costa A; Iriarte Á; Simões A; de Almeida JJ; Comesaña M; Perea M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):680-96. PubMed ID: 25263599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SUBTLEX-NL: a new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles.
    Keuleers E; Brysbaert M; New B
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):643-50. PubMed ID: 20805586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Just Google It: An Approach on Word Frequencies Based on Online Search Result.
    Moret-Tatay C; Gamermann D; Murphy M; Kuzmičová A
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(2):170-182. PubMed ID: 29757115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
    Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shabd: A psycholinguistic database for Hindi.
    Verma A; Sikarwar V; Yadav H; Jaganathan R; Kumar P
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Apr; 54(2):830-844. PubMed ID: 34357542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social Media and Language Processing: How Facebook and Twitter Provide the Best Frequency Estimates for Studying Word Recognition.
    Herdağdelen A; Marelli M
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41(4):976-995. PubMed ID: 27477913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 22936106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CCLOOW: Chinese children's lexicon of oral words.
    Li L; Zhao W; Song M; Wang J; Cai Q
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):846-859. PubMed ID: 36881355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies.
    Brysbaert M; New B; Keuleers E
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):991-7. PubMed ID: 22396136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking: evidence from chronolex.
    Ferrand L; Brysbaert M; Keuleers E; New B; Bonin P; Méot A; Augustinova M; Pallier C
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():306. PubMed ID: 22053160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.