These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21714709)

  • 21. The listening in spatialized noise test: an auditory processing disorder study.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 May; 17(5):306-20. PubMed ID: 16796298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acoustic Reflexes in Normal-Hearing Adults, Typically Developing Children, and Children with Suspected Auditory Processing Disorder: Thresholds, Real-Ear Corrections, and the Role of Static Compliance on Estimates.
    Saxena U; Allan C; Allen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jun; 28(6):480-490. PubMed ID: 28590893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Casey KA; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory and cognitive abilities of children suspected of auditory processing disorder (APD).
    Rosen S; Cohen M; Vanniasegaram I
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 74(6):594-600. PubMed ID: 20347161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Self-reported hearing problems among older adults: prevalence and comparison to measured hearing impairment.
    Hannula S; Bloigu R; Majamaa K; Sorri M; Mäki-Torkko E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):550-9. PubMed ID: 22031679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss.
    Stapells DR; Gravel JS; Martin BA
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 8549892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
    Johnson TA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
    De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: current use in seven countries and development of a US version.
    Watson CS; Kidd GR; Miller JD; Smits C; Humes LE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):757-67. PubMed ID: 23169193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic Hearing Assessment in Schools: Validity and Time Efficiency of Automated Audiometry.
    Mahomed-Asmail F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26809325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The hearing threshold levels of children at school age.
    Haapaniemi JJ
    Ear Hear; 1996 Dec; 17(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 8979035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss.
    Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prevalence of Auditory Processing Disorder in School-Aged Children in the Mid-Atlantic Region.
    Nagao K; Riegner T; Padilla J; Greenwood LA; Loson J; Zavala S; Morlet T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):691-700. PubMed ID: 27718346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Smartphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary health-care contexts.
    Sandström J; Swanepoel de W; Carel Myburgh H; Laurent C
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 26795898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prevalence of Hearing Loss Among Children 9 to 11 Years Old: The Generation R Study.
    le Clercq CMP; van Ingen G; Ruytjens L; Goedegebure A; Moll HA; Raat H; Jaddoe VWV; Baatenburg de Jong RJ; van der Schroeff MP
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Sep; 143(9):928-934. PubMed ID: 28750130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Audiometric thresholds among a Canadian sample of 10 to 17 year old students.
    Marcoux AM; Feder K; Keith SE; Marro L; James ME; Michaud DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2787-98. PubMed ID: 22501057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.