BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21714744)

  • 1. The effect of information distribution on collaborative inhibition.
    Meade ML; Gigone D
    Memory; 2011 Jul; 19(5):417-28. PubMed ID: 21714744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's collaborative recall of shared and unshared information.
    Gummerum M; Leman PJ; Hollins TS
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2013 Sep; 31(Pt 3):302-17. PubMed ID: 23901844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Younger and older adults' collaborative recall of shared and unshared emotional pictures.
    Barber SJ; Castrellon JJ; Opitz P; Mather M
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):716-730. PubMed ID: 28224452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition?
    Takahashi M; Saito S
    Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):722-31. PubMed ID: 15724361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specific collaborative inhibition?
    Dahlström Ö; Danielsson H; Emilsson M; Andersson J
    Memory; 2011 Feb; 19(2):140-54. PubMed ID: 21331969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
    Congleton AR; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 21744986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists.
    Hyman IE; Cardwell BA; Roy RA
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):875-90. PubMed ID: 23439153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of collaboration on recall of social information.
    Reysen MB; Talbert NG; Dominko M; Jones AN; Kelley MR
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 102(3):646-61. PubMed ID: 21752012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A meta-analytic review of collaborative inhibition and postcollaborative memory: Testing the predictions of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis.
    Marion SB; Thorley C
    Psychol Bull; 2016 Nov; 142(11):1141-1164. PubMed ID: 27618544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 22686851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting with implicit-memory tests.
    Perfect TJ; Moulin CJ; Conway MA; Perry E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1111-9. PubMed ID: 12450336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collaborative recall of details of an emotional film.
    Wessel I; Zandstra AR; Hengeveld HM; Moulds ML
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 24628679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Silence is not golden: a case for socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Cuc A; Koppel J; Hirst W
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Aug; 18(8):727-33. PubMed ID: 17680945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Building consensus about the past: schema consistency and convergence in socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Stone CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J; Hirst W
    Memory; 2010 Feb; 18(2):170-84. PubMed ID: 19693723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.
    Barber SJ; Harris CB; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 25068855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social contagion of correct and incorrect information in memory.
    Rush RA; Clark SE
    Memory; 2014; 22(8):937-48. PubMed ID: 24295276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2008 Apr; 16(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 18324549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of the timing and identity of retrieval cues in individual recall: an attempt to mimic cross-cueing in collaborative recall.
    Andersson J; Hitch G; Meudell P
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 16423746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elimination of collaborative inhibition effect using the Method of Loci.
    Saraiva M; Albuquerque PB; Arantes J
    Psicothema; 2016 May; 28(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 27112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.