406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21716085)
1. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: the impact of tumor grade on outcome.
Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Sukov WR; Thompson RH; Leibovich BC
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 22367296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic significance of high nuclear grade in patients with pathologic T1a renal cell carcinoma.
Suzuki K; Mizuno R; Mikami S; Tanaka N; Kanao K; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Nakagawa K; Oya M
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Sep; 42(9):831-5. PubMed ID: 22811408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A proposal for reclassification of the Fuhrman grading system in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Sun M; Lughezzani G; Jeldres C; Isbarn H; Shariat SF; Arjane P; Widmer H; Pharand D; Latour M; Perrotte P; Patard JJ; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):775-81. PubMed ID: 19573980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Pathological prognostic indicators in renal cell carcinoma].
Rey Rey J; León Ramírez D; López García S; Fernández Vázquez P; Benavente Delgado J; Ojea Calvo A
Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jan; 34(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 20223135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical impact of the presence of the worst nucleolar grade in renal cell carcinoma specimens.
Ito K; Yoshii H; Asakuma J; Sato A; Horiguchi A; Sumitomo M; Hayakawa M; Asano T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Sep; 39(9):588-94. PubMed ID: 19556339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of pNx/pN0 grouping in a multivariate setting for outcome modeling in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Ward JF; Blute ML; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Weaver AL; Zincke H
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 12050492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. pT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study of the association between MIB-1 proliferative activity and pathologic features and cancer specific survival.
Cheville JC; Zincke H; Lohse CM; Sebo TJ; Riehle D; Weaver AL; Blute ML
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2180-4. PubMed ID: 12001115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel grading system for clear cell renal cell carcinoma incorporating tumor necrosis.
Delahunt B; McKenney JK; Lohse CM; Leibovich BC; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Cheville JC
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Mar; 37(3):311-22. PubMed ID: 23348209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: correlation of tumor grade and histologic characteristics with clinical outcome.
Cornejo KM; Dong F; Zhou AG; Wu CL; Young RH; Braaten K; Sadow PM; Nielsen GP; Oliva E
Hum Pathol; 2015 Oct; 46(10):1411-7. PubMed ID: 26297250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology.
Zigeuner R; Hutterer G; Chromecki T; Imamovic A; Kampel-Kettner K; Rehak P; Langner C; Pummer K
Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 19062157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
