These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2171874)

  • 1. Suspended judgment. Significance tests of covariate imbalance in clinical trials.
    Begg CB
    Control Clin Trials; 1990 Aug; 11(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 2171874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing for imbalance of covariates in controlled experiments.
    Permutt T
    Stat Med; 1990 Dec; 9(12):1455-62. PubMed ID: 2281233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Covariate imbalance and precision in measuring treatment effects.
    Liu XS
    Eval Rev; 2011 Dec; 35(6):627-41. PubMed ID: 22473493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.
    Moerbeek M; van Schie S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():79. PubMed ID: 27401771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confounding of subgroup analyses in randomized data.
    Groenwold RH; Donders AR; van der Heijden GJ; Hoes AW; Rovers MM
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Sep; 169(16):1532-4. PubMed ID: 19752412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomised controlled trials: understanding confounding.
    Sedgwick P
    BMJ; 2015 Sep; 351():h5119. PubMed ID: 26408098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpreting the results of observational research: chance is not such a fine thing.
    Brennan P; Croft P
    BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6956):727-30. PubMed ID: 7950528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Pereira C; Castilho E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dealing with competing risks: testing covariates and calculating sample size.
    Pintilie M
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3317-24. PubMed ID: 12407674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negative Control Outcomes: A Tool to Detect Bias in Randomized Trials.
    Arnold BF; Ercumen A
    JAMA; 2016 Dec; 316(24):2597-2598. PubMed ID: 28027378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
    Shahar E; Shahar DJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Covariate balance for no confounding in the sufficient-cause model.
    Suzuki E; Tsuda T; Yamamoto E
    Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):48-53.e2. PubMed ID: 29241736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confounding in health research.
    Greenland S; Morgenstern H
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2001; 22():189-212. PubMed ID: 11274518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concerns about run-in periods in randomized trials.
    Riley D
    JAMA; 1998 May; 279(19):1526; author reply 1527. PubMed ID: 9605893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Potential for Postrandomization Confounding in Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Manson JE; Shufelt CL; Robins JM
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(21):2273-4. PubMed ID: 27272576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognizing chronological bias for what it is.
    Berger VW
    Clin Trials; 2011 Dec; 8(6):768; author reply 769. PubMed ID: 22167114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confounding, effect modification, and the odds ratio: common misinterpretations.
    Shrier I; Pang M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):470-4. PubMed ID: 25662008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of clinical trial outcomes: some comments on subgroup analyses.
    Buyse ME
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Dec; 10(4 Suppl):187S-194S. PubMed ID: 2605967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results from randomized, controlled trials of the effects of cognitive remediation on neurocognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia.
    Kurtz MM; Moberg PJ; Gur RC; Gur RE
    Psychol Med; 2004 Apr; 34(3):569-70. PubMed ID: 15259841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.