602 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21718990)
1. Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment.
D'Angelo DV; Whitehead N; Helms K; Barfield W; Ahluwalia IB
Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):314-320.e2. PubMed ID: 21718990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
Schieve LA; Ferre C; Peterson HB; Macaluso M; Reynolds MA; Wright VC
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1144-53. PubMed ID: 15172846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance -
United States, 2013.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used.
Hayashi M; Nakai A; Satoh S; Matsuda Y
Fertil Steril; 2012 Oct; 98(4):922-8. PubMed ID: 22763098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006.
Sunderam S; Chang J; Flowers L; Kulkarni A; Sentelle G; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2009 Jun; 58(5):1-25. PubMed ID: 19521336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology.
Schieve LA; Meikle SF; Ferre C; Peterson HB; Jeng G; Wilcox LS
N Engl J Med; 2002 Mar; 346(10):731-7. PubMed ID: 11882728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2004.
Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Chen M; Macaluso M;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2007 Jun; 56(6):1-22. PubMed ID: 17557073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2005.
Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2008 Jun; 57(5):1-23. PubMed ID: 18566567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assisted reproductive technology and perinatal outcomes: conventional versus discordant-sibling design.
Dhalwani NN; Boulet SL; Kissin DM; Zhang Y; McKane P; Bailey MA; Hood ME; Tata LJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):710-716.e2. PubMed ID: 27187051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2002.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2005 Jun; 54(2):1-24. PubMed ID: 15931153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2003.
Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2006 May; 55(4):1-22. PubMed ID: 16723970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology.
Martin AS; Chang J; Zhang Y; Kawwass JF; Boulet SL; McKane P; Bernson D; Kissin DM; Jamieson DJ;
Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 28292615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current overview of pregnancy complications and live-birth outcome of assisted reproductive technology in mainland China.
Yang X; Li Y; Li C; Zhang W
Fertil Steril; 2014 Feb; 101(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 24269043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preterm birth, ovarian endometriomata, and assisted reproduction technologies.
Fernando S; Breheny S; Jaques AM; Halliday JL; Baker G; Healy D
Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):325-30. PubMed ID: 18384780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
