166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21719321)
1. Evaluation of combined oncologic and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control.
Xylinas E; Durand X; Ploussard G; Campeggi A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 21719321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Shikanov SA; Zorn KC; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2009 Sep; 74(3):619-23. PubMed ID: 19592075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative risk stratification predicts likelihood of concurrent PSA-free survival, continence, and potency (the trifecta analysis) after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Pierorazio PM; Spencer BA; McCann TR; McKiernan JM; Benson MC
Urology; 2007 Oct; 70(4):717-22. PubMed ID: 17991543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?
Marien TP; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in continence and erectile function between 2 and 4 years after radical prostatectomy.
Glickman L; Godoy G; Lepor H
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):731-5. PubMed ID: 19091349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introducing a new, simple scoring system to evaluate oncological and functional outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Salomon L; Anastasiadis A; Saint F; De La Taille A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2003; 37(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 14594687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age stratified functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Rogers CG; Su LM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Wagner A; Pavlovich CP
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2448-52. PubMed ID: 17085126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
Carini M; Masieri L; Minervini A; Lapini A; Serni S
Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Srinualnad S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Mar; 91(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 18575292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program.
Varkarakis J; Pinggera GM; Sebe P; Berger A; Bartsch G; Horninger W
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 14972485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Achieving optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
Saranchuk JW; Kattan MW; Elkin E; Touijer AK; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jun; 23(18):4146-51. PubMed ID: 15961762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.
Catalona WJ; Carvalhal GF; Mager DE; Smith DS
J Urol; 1999 Aug; 162(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 10411052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.
Chien GW; Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Zagaja GP; Sokoloff MH; Brendler CB; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 16040100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oncologic outcome and continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 3 years' follow-up in a "second generation center".
Galli S; Simonato A; Bozzola A; Gregori A; Lissiani A; Scaburri A; Gaboardi F
Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):859-65. PubMed ID: 16519991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [How to present in a unique fashion the oncologic and functional results after radical prostatectomy].
Salomon L; Saint F; Anastasiadis AG; Sebe P; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prog Urol; 2003 Sep; 13(4):624-8. PubMed ID: 14650294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seminal monolateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in selected patients.
Bellina M; Mari M; Ambu A; Guercio S; Rolle L; Tampellini M
Urol Int; 2005; 75(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 16123574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postoperative urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Carlsson S; Nilsson A; Wiklund PN
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 16608806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite versus Incontinence Symptom Index and Sexual Health Inventory for Men to measure functional outcomes after prostatectomy.
Hedgepeth RC; Labo J; Zhang L; Wood DP
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):221-7; discussion 227-8. PubMed ID: 19450842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
