These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21719554)

  • 1. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry for audit and quality assessment of percutaneous coronary interventions in the United Kingdom.
    Ludman PF;
    Heart; 2011 Aug; 97(16):1293-7. PubMed ID: 21719554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society registry framework: a quality improvement initiative on behalf of the National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR).
    Rashid M; Ludman PF; Mamas MA
    Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2019 Oct; 5(4):292-297. PubMed ID: 31050720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The importance of audit to monitor applications of procedures and improve primary angioplasty results.
    Ludman PF; de Belder MA; McLenachan JM; Birkhead JS; Cunningham D; Gray HH
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Aug; 8 Suppl P():P62-70. PubMed ID: 22917794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock following percutaneous coronary intervention in the contemporary era: an analysis from the BCIS database (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society).
    Kunadian V; Qiu W; Ludman P; Redwood S; Curzen N; Stables R; Gunn J; Gershlick A;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(12):1374-85. PubMed ID: 25523531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The NCDR CathPCI Registry: a US national perspective on care and outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Moussa I; Hermann A; Messenger JC; Dehmer GJ; Weaver WD; Rumsfeld JS; Masoudi FA
    Heart; 2013 Mar; 99(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 23322530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality assurance in interventional cardiology. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.
    Perrins J
    Heart; 1999 Oct; 82 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):II23-6. PubMed ID: 10490585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion: insights from the ERCTO (European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion) registry.
    Galassi AR; Tomasello SD; Reifart N; Werner GS; Sianos G; Bonnier H; Sievert H; Ehladad S; Bufe A; Shofer J; Gershlick A; Hildick-Smith D; Escaned J; Erglis A; Sheiban I; Thuesen L; Serra A; Christiansen E; Buettner A; Costanzo L; Barrano G; Di Mario C
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Aug; 7(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 21764666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States.
    Thomas MP; Parzynski CS; Curtis JP; Seth M; Nallamothu BK; Chan PS; Spertus JA; Patel MR; Bradley SM; Gurm HS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138251. PubMed ID: 26379053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries versus bypass grafts in prior coronary artery bypass grafting patients: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
    Brilakis ES; Rao SV; Banerjee S; Goldman S; Shunk KA; Holmes DR; Honeycutt E; Roe MT
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 4(8):844-50. PubMed ID: 21851896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In-hospital outcomes of very elderly patients (85 years and older) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Appleby CE; Ivanov J; Mackie K; Džavík V; Overgaard CB
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Apr; 77(5):634-41. PubMed ID: 21387535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term follow-up of elective chronic total coronary occlusion angioplasty: analysis from the U.K. Central Cardiac Audit Database.
    George S; Cockburn J; Clayton TC; Ludman P; Cotton J; Spratt J; Redwood S; de Belder M; de Belder A; Hill J; Hoye A; Palmer N; Rathore S; Gershlick A; Di Mario C; Hildick-Smith D; ;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 64(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 25034057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percutaneous coronary intervention use in the United States: defining measures of appropriateness.
    Marso SP; Teirstein PS; Kereiakes DJ; Moses J; Lasala J; Grantham JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Feb; 5(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 22326193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance monitoring in interventional cardiology: application of statistical process control to a single-site database.
    Smith IR; Rivers JT; Mengersen KL; Cameron J
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Mar; 6(8):955-62. PubMed ID: 21330243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective peer review of regional percutaneous interventional procedures: a tool for quality control and revalidation.
    Blows LH; Dixon GF; Behan MW; Allen R; Cohen AS; Dickinson K; Furniss S; Hatrick R; Hildick-Smith D; Holmberg S; Hyde JA; Kneale B; Lewis ME; Lloyd G; Patel NR; Pegge N; Signy M; Sulke AN; Trivedi U; Walker DM; de Belder AJ
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Dec; 8(8):939-44. PubMed ID: 23253547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Percutaneous coronary intervention and 30-day mortality: the British Columbia PCI risk score.
    Hamburger JN; Walsh SJ; Khurana R; Ding L; Gao M; Humphries KH; Carere R; Fung AY; Mildenberger RR; Simkus GJ; Webb JG; Buller CE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Sep; 74(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 19681116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drug-eluting stents and the use of percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with class I indications for coronary artery bypass surgery undergoing index revascularization: analysis from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry).
    Frutkin AD; Lindsey JB; Mehta SK; House JA; Spertus JA; Cohen DJ; Rumsfeld JS; Marso SP;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Jul; 2(7):614-21. PubMed ID: 19628183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A longitudinal assessment of coronary interventional program quality: a report from the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
    Klein LW; Kolm P; Xu X; Krone RJ; Anderson HV; Rumsfeld JS; Brindis RG; Weintraub WS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Feb; 2(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 19463415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
    Rao SV; Ou FS; Wang TY; Roe MT; Brindis R; Rumsfeld JS; Peterson ED
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Aug; 1(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 19463333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics and long-term outcomes of percutaneous revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in the United States: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2004 to 2008.
    Brennan JM; Dai D; Patel MR; Rao SV; Armstrong EJ; Messenger JC; Curtis JP; Shunk KA; Anstrom KJ; Eisenstein EL; Weintraub WS; Peterson ED; Douglas PS; Hillegass WB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Feb; 59(7):648-54. PubMed ID: 22322080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defining operative mortality: Impact on outcome reporting.
    Maximus S; Milliken JC; Danielsen B; Khan J; Shemin R; Carey JS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 151(4):1101-7. PubMed ID: 26876420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.