These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21720920)

  • 21. The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision.
    Muncer SJ; Knight DC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2221-30. PubMed ID: 22804754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition.
    Cortese MJ; Schock J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):946-72. PubMed ID: 23030642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Chinese Lexicon Project: a repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters.
    Sze WP; Rickard Liow SJ; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):263-73. PubMed ID: 23813237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Imageability estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words.
    Schock J; Cortese MJ; Khanna MM
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):374-9. PubMed ID: 22037976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing ease-of-processing values of the same set of words for native English speakers and Japanese learners of English.
    Takashima H
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Dec; 38(6):549-72. PubMed ID: 19484388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of Persian Lexical Neighborhood Tests.
    Oryadi-Zanjani MM; Zamani A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 139():110406. PubMed ID: 33152584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How well imageability, concreteness, perceptual strength, and action strength predict recognition memory, lexical decision, and reading aloud performance.
    Khanna MM; Cortese MJ
    Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):622-636. PubMed ID: 33971794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Persian Lexicon Project: minimized orthographic neighbourhood effects in a dense language.
    Nemati F; Westbury C; Hollis G; Haghbin H
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Oct; 51(5):957-979. PubMed ID: 35366147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words.
    Kuperman V; Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Brysbaert M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):978-90. PubMed ID: 22581493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.
    New B; Ferrand L; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 16724767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition.
    Hargreaves IS; Pexman PM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():234. PubMed ID: 22912610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on word recognition.
    Marelli M; Amenta S; Crepaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 25269473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Imageability and body-object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns.
    Bennett SD; Burnett AN; Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1100-9. PubMed ID: 21681627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. MorphoLex: A derivational morphological database for 70,000 English words.
    Sánchez-Gutiérrez CH; Mailhot H; Deacon SH; Wilson MA
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1568-1580. PubMed ID: 29124719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.
    Pexman PM; Muraki E; Sidhu DM; Siakaluk PD; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):453-466. PubMed ID: 30484218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Feature distinctiveness effects in language acquisition and lexical processing: Insights from megastudies.
    Siew CSQ
    Cogn Process; 2020 Nov; 21(4):669-685. PubMed ID: 31974763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is the L2 lexicon different from the L1 lexicon? Evidence from novel word lexicalization.
    Qiao X; Forster KI
    Cognition; 2017 Jan; 158():147-152. PubMed ID: 27835785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Filling the gaps: A speeded word fragment completion megastudy.
    Heyman T; Van Akeren L; Hutchison KA; Storms G
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1508-1527. PubMed ID: 26487049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?
    Brysbaert M; Cortese MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 20700859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.