197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21720993)
1. Prospective impact of tumor grade assessment in biopsies on tumor stage and prognostic grouping in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: relevance of the seventh edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual revision.
Dikken JL; Coit DG; Klimstra DS; Rizk NP; van Grieken N; Ilson D; Tang LH
Cancer; 2012 Jan; 118(2):349-57. PubMed ID: 21720993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Refining esophageal cancer staging after neoadjuvant therapy: importance of treatment response.
Barbour AP; Jones M; Gonen M; Gotley DC; Thomas J; Thomson DB; Burmeister B; Smithers BM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2894-902. PubMed ID: 18663531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the N1c category of the new American Joint Committee on cancer staging system applicable to patients with rectal cancer who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy?
Song JS; Chang HJ; Kim DY; Kim SY; Baek JY; Park JW; Park SC; Choi HS; Oh JH
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(17):3917-24. PubMed ID: 21858800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do tumor grade and location affect survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? Survival analysis of 302 cases of pT3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Situ D; Wei W; Lin P; Long H; Zhang L; Fu J; Rong T; Ma G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):580-5. PubMed ID: 23015029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.
Le QT; Fu KK; Kaplan M; Terris DJ; Fee WE; Goffinet DR
Cancer; 1999 Nov; 86(9):1700-11. PubMed ID: 10547542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathologic prognostic factors in Barrett's associated adenocarcinoma: a follow-up study of 96 patients.
Torres C; Turner JR; Wang HH; Richards W; Sugarbaker D; Shahsafaei A; Odze RD
Cancer; 1999 Feb; 85(3):520-8. PubMed ID: 10091725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Refining esophageal cancer staging.
Rice TW; Blackstone EH; Rybicki LA; Adelstein DJ; Murthy SC; DeCamp MM; Goldblum JR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 May; 125(5):1103-13. PubMed ID: 12771884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system does not accurately predict survival in patients receiving multimodality therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Rizk NP; Venkatraman E; Bains MS; Park B; Flores R; Tang L; Ilson DH; Minsky BD; Rusch VW;
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Feb; 25(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17290058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the accuracy of TNM staging in esophageal cancer: a pathological review of resected specimens.
Thompson SK; Ruszkiewicz AR; Jamieson GG; Esterman A; Watson DI; Wijnhoven BP; Lamb PJ; Devitt PG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):3447-58. PubMed ID: 18830669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical utility of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: current overall survival after primary tumor resection.
Rutkowski P; Wozniak A; Dębiec-Rychter M; Kąkol M; Dziewirski W; Zdzienicki M; Ptaszynski K; Jurkowska M; Limon J; Siedlecki JA
Cancer; 2011 Nov; 117(21):4916-24. PubMed ID: 21456019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of prognostic compatibility between seventh AJCC/TNM of the esophagus and 14th JCGC staging systems in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma.
Kawaguchi T; Komatsu S; Ichikawa D; Kubota T; Okamoto K; Shiozaki A; Fujiwara H; Konishi H; Morimura R; Murayama Y; Kuriu Y; Ikoma H; Nakanishi M; Sakakura C; Otsuji E
Anticancer Res; 2013 Aug; 33(8):3461-5. PubMed ID: 23898120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of sixth and seventh edition of the American Joint Cancer Committee staging systems for esophageal cancer.
Yam PC; Tong D; Law S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 21(2):583-8. PubMed ID: 24197762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction after preoperative chemoradiation.
Wang KL; Yang Q; Cleary KR; Swisher SG; Correa AM; Komaki R; Ajani JA; Rashid A; Hamilton SR; Wu TT
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 107(7):1467-74. PubMed ID: 16955509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.
Rizk N; Venkatraman E; Park B; Flores R; Bains MS; Rusch V;
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 132(6):1374-81. PubMed ID: 17140960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer.
Greenstein AJ; Litle VR; Swanson SJ; Divino CM; Packer S; Wisnivesky JP
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(6):1239-46. PubMed ID: 18224663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Staging of esophageal carcinoma: length of tumor and number of involved regional lymph nodes. Are these independent prognostic factors?
Bollschweiler E; Baldus SE; Schröder W; Schneider PM; Hölscher AH
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Oct; 94(5):355-63. PubMed ID: 16967455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ): impact of adequate staging on outcome.
Barbour AP; Rizk NP; Gonen M; Tang L; Bains MS; Rusch VW; Coit DG; Brennan MF
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):306-16. PubMed ID: 17091329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of tumor grade on pancreatic cancer prognosis: validation of a novel TNMG staging system.
Rochefort MM; Ankeny JS; Kadera BE; Donald GW; Isacoff W; Wainberg ZA; Hines OJ; Donahue TR; Reber HA; Tomlinson JS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Dec; 20(13):4322-9. PubMed ID: 23943022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Staging of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: comparison of AJCC 6th and 7th gastric and 7th esophageal staging systems.
Kim HI; Cheong JH; Song KJ; An JY; Hyung WJ; Noh SH; Kim CB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2713-20. PubMed ID: 23456315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status.
Eloubeidi MA; Desmond R; Arguedas MR; Reed CE; Wilcox CM
Cancer; 2002 Oct; 95(7):1434-43. PubMed ID: 12237911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
