These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21721619)

  • 1. Decoherence and surface hopping: when can averaging over initial conditions help capture the effects of wave packet separation?
    Subotnik JE; Shenvi N
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Jun; 134(24):244114. PubMed ID: 21721619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new approach to decoherence and momentum rescaling in the surface hopping algorithm.
    Subotnik JE; Shenvi N
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Jan; 134(2):024105. PubMed ID: 21241078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fewest-switches surface hopping and decoherence in multiple dimensions.
    Subotnik JE
    J Phys Chem A; 2011 Nov; 115(44):12083-96. PubMed ID: 21995423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can we derive Tully's surface-hopping algorithm from the semiclassical quantum Liouville equation? Almost, but only with decoherence.
    Subotnik JE; Ouyang W; Landry BR
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Dec; 139(21):214107. PubMed ID: 24320364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mean-field dynamics with stochastic decoherence (MF-SD): a new algorithm for nonadiabatic mixed quantum/classical molecular-dynamics simulations with nuclear-induced decoherence.
    Bedard-Hearn MJ; Larsen RE; Schwartz BJ
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Dec; 123(23):234106. PubMed ID: 16392913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the role of decoherence in condensed-phase nonadiabatic dynamics: a comparison of different mixed quantum/classical simulation algorithms for the excited hydrated electron.
    Larsen RE; Bedard-Hearn MJ; Schwartz BJ
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Oct; 110(40):20055-66. PubMed ID: 17020394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous-trajectory surface hopping: a parameter-free algorithm for implementing decoherence in nonadiabatic dynamics.
    Shenvi N; Subotnik JE; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Apr; 134(14):144102. PubMed ID: 21495737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regarding the validity of the time-dependent Kohn-Sham approach for electron-nuclear dynamics via trajectory surface hopping.
    Fischer SA; Habenicht BF; Madrid AB; Duncan WR; Prezhdo OV
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Jan; 134(2):024102. PubMed ID: 21241075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Augmented Ehrenfest dynamics yields a rate for surface hopping.
    Subotnik JE
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Apr; 132(13):134112. PubMed ID: 20387926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface Hopping without Momentum Jumps: A Quantum-Trajectory-Based Approach to Nonadiabatic Dynamics.
    Martens CC
    J Phys Chem A; 2019 Feb; 123(5):1110-1128. PubMed ID: 30632757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic decoherence.
    Nelson T; Fernandez-Alberti S; Roitberg AE; Tretiak S
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Jun; 138(22):224111. PubMed ID: 23781787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to recover Marcus theory with fewest switches surface hopping: add just a touch of decoherence.
    Landry BR; Subotnik JE
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Dec; 137(22):22A513. PubMed ID: 23249050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An efficient solution to the decoherence enhanced trivial crossing problem in surface hopping.
    Bai X; Qiu J; Wang L
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Mar; 148(10):104106. PubMed ID: 29544303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the entropy and quantifying the impurity of a swarm of surface-hopping trajectories: a new perspective on decoherence.
    Ouyang W; Subotnik JE
    J Chem Phys; 2014 May; 140(20):204102. PubMed ID: 24880261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical appraisal of the fewest switches algorithm for surface hopping.
    Granucci G; Persico M
    J Chem Phys; 2007 Apr; 126(13):134114. PubMed ID: 17430023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Achieving partial decoherence in surface hopping through phase correction.
    Shenvi N; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Dec; 137(22):22A528. PubMed ID: 23249065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A semiclassical study of wave packet dynamics in anharmonic potentials.
    Yang S; Cao J; Field RW
    J Chem Phys; 2004 Oct; 121(14):6599-607. PubMed ID: 15473714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mapping approach to surface hopping.
    Mannouch JR; Richardson JO
    J Chem Phys; 2023 Mar; 158(10):104111. PubMed ID: 36922129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Including quantum decoherence in surface hopping.
    Granucci G; Persico M; Zoccante A
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Oct; 133(13):134111. PubMed ID: 20942527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface hopping, transition state theory, and decoherence. II. Thermal rate constants and detailed balance.
    Jain A; Subotnik JE
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Oct; 143(13):134107. PubMed ID: 26450292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.