197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21721923)
1. Evaluation of the skin sensitization potential of chemicals in THP-1/keratinocyte co-cultures.
Cao YP; Ma PC; Liu WD; Zhou WQ; Tao Y; Zhang ML; Li LJ; Chen ZY
Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol; 2012 Apr; 34(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 21721923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross talk between keratinocytes and dendritic cells: impact on the prediction of sensitization.
Hennen J; Aeby P; Goebel C; Schettgen T; Oberli A; Kalmes M; Blömeke B
Toxicol Sci; 2011 Oct; 123(2):501-10. PubMed ID: 21742781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship between CD86/CD54 expression and THP-1 cell viability in an in vitro skin sensitization test--human cell line activation test (h-CLAT).
Sakaguchi H; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Kosaka N; Ito Y; Yoneyama K; Sono S; Itagaki H; Toyoda H; Suzuki H
Cell Biol Toxicol; 2009 Apr; 25(2):109-26. PubMed ID: 18204907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Expression of surface markers on the human monocytic leukaemia cell line, THP-1, as indicators for the sensitizing potential of chemicals.
An S; Kim S; Huh Y; Lee TR; Kim HK; Park KL; Eun HC
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Apr; 60(4):185-92. PubMed ID: 19338585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the skin sensitization potential of chemicals using expression of co-stimulatory molecules, CD54 and CD86, on the naive THP-1 cell line.
Yoshida Y; Sakaguchi H; Ito Y; Okuda M; Suzuki H
Toxicol In Vitro; 2003 Apr; 17(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 12650676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dendritic cells differently respond to haptens and irritants by their production of cytokines and expression of co-stimulatory molecules.
Aiba S; Terunuma A; Manome H; Tagami H
Eur J Immunol; 1997 Nov; 27(11):3031-8. PubMed ID: 9394834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Keratinocytes improve prediction of sensitization potential and potency of chemicals with THP-1 cells.
Hennen J; Blömeke B
ALTEX; 2017; 34(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 27768804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The expression of surface markers on dendritic cells as indicators for the sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Tuschl H; Kovac R; Weber E
Toxicol In Vitro; 2000 Dec; 14(6):541-9. PubMed ID: 11033066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phenotypic alterations and cytokine production in THP-1 cells in response to allergens.
Miyazawa M; Ito Y; Yoshida Y; Sakaguchi H; Suzuki H
Toxicol In Vitro; 2007 Apr; 21(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 17118622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of the human monocytic leukemia THP-1 cell line and co-incubation with microsomes to identify and differentiate hapten and prohapten sensitizers.
Chipinda I; Ruwona TB; Templeton SP; Siegel PD
Toxicology; 2011 Feb; 280(3):135-43. PubMed ID: 21163322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of preservative sensitization potential using surface marker CD86 and/or CD54 expression on human cell line, THP-1.
Sakaguchi H; Miyazawa M; Yoshida Y; Ito Y; Suzuki H
Arch Dermatol Res; 2007 Feb; 298(9):427-37. PubMed ID: 17119987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a new in vitro skin sensitization assay (Epidermal Sensitization Assay; EpiSensA) using reconstructed human epidermis.
Saito K; Nukada Y; Takenouchi O; Miyazawa M; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Dec; 27(8):2213-24. PubMed ID: 23999411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cytokine-dependent MUTZ-3 cell line as an in vitro model for the screening of contact sensitizers.
Azam P; Peiffer JL; Chamousset D; Tissier MH; Bonnet PA; Vian L; Fabre I; Ourlin JC
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2006 Apr; 212(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 16039684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The THP-1 cell toolbox: a new concept integrating the key events of skin sensitization.
Clouet E; Bechara R; Raffalli C; Damiens MH; Groux H; Pallardy M; Ferret PJ; Kerdine-Römer S
Arch Toxicol; 2019 Apr; 93(4):941-951. PubMed ID: 30806763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of CD86 expression and MHC class II molecule internalization in THP-1 human monocyte cells as predictive endpoints for contact sensitizers.
Ashikaga T; Hoya M; Itagaki H; Katsumura Y; Aiba S
Toxicol In Vitro; 2002 Dec; 16(6):711-6. PubMed ID: 12423654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A loose-fit coculture of activated keratinocytes and dendritic cell-related cells for prediction of sensitizing potential.
Schreiner M; Peiser M; Briechle D; Stahlmann R; Zuberbier T; Wanner R
Allergy; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1419-28. PubMed ID: 17983376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acidic conditions induce the suppression of CD86 and CD54 expression in THP-1 cells.
Mitachi T; Mezaki M; Yamashita K; Itagaki H
J Toxicol Sci; 2018; 43(5):299-309. PubMed ID: 29743441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel method to generate monocyte-derived dendritic cells during coculture with HaCaT facilitates detection of weak contact allergens in cosmetics.
Frombach J; Sonnenburg A; Krapohl BD; Zuberbier T; Stahlmann R; Schreiner M
Arch Toxicol; 2017 Jan; 91(1):339-350. PubMed ID: 27136899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of IL-18 production in a human keratinocyte cell line to discriminate contact sensitizers from irritants and low molecular weight respiratory allergens.
Corsini E; Mitjans M; Galbiati V; Lucchi L; Galli CL; Marinovich M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Aug; 23(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 19397996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitization assays: monocyte-derived dendritic cells versus a monocytic cell line (THP-1).
Tietze C; Blomeke B
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):965-8. PubMed ID: 18569603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]