These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21722057)

  • 1. Processing temporary syntactic ambiguity: the effect of contextual bias.
    Mohamed MT; Clifton C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1797-820. PubMed ID: 21722057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do verb bias effects on sentence production reflect sensitivity to comprehension or production factors?
    Ferreira VS; Schotter ER
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Aug; 66(8):1548-71. PubMed ID: 23286581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Plausibility and verb subeategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2005 Jan; 34(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 15968918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spanish-English L2 speakers' use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading.
    Dussias PE; Cramer Scaltz TR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jul; 128(3):501-13. PubMed ID: 18001689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing.
    Schmauder AR; Egan MC
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1304-12. PubMed ID: 9847553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Verb Bias and Syntactic Ambiguity on Reading in People with Aphasia.
    Dede G
    Aphasiology; 2013 Oct; 27(10-12):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 24683286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension.
    Kennison SM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 11340858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thematic roles in sentence parsing.
    Clifton C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Jun; 47(2):222-46. PubMed ID: 8364531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of sense-contingent argument structure frequencies on ambiguity resolution in aphasia.
    Huck A; Thompson RL; Cruice M; Marshall J
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jun; 100():171-194. PubMed ID: 28392303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.
    Trueswell JC; Tanenhaus MK; Kello C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 May; 19(3):528-53. PubMed ID: 8501429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of context in resolving syntactic ambiguity: Structural and semantic influences.
    Bousquet K; Swaab TY; Long DL
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2020; 35(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 32953924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences.
    Kuperberg GR; Sitnikova T; Caplan D; Holcomb PJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jun; 17(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 12763198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German.
    Bahlmann J; Rodriguez-Fornells A; Rotte M; Münte TF
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Oct; 28(10):940-9. PubMed ID: 17274018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: an analysis with event-related potentials.
    Mecklinger A; Schriefers H; Steinhauer K; Friederici AD
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):477-94. PubMed ID: 7666761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Plausibility and subcategorization preference in children's processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):75-96. PubMed ID: 11873857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosodic phrasing in the presence of unambiguous verb information--ERP evidence from German.
    Augurzky P; Kotchoubey B
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jan; 81():31-49. PubMed ID: 26656565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misinterpretations in agreement and agreement attraction.
    Patson ND; Husband EM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):950-71. PubMed ID: 25624171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency.
    Spivey MJ; Tanenhaus MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1521-43. PubMed ID: 9835064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.