355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21722190)
1. Enhanced implant integration with hierarchically structured implants: a pilot study in rabbits.
Johansson CB; Gretzer C; Jimbo R; Mattisson I; Ahlberg E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):943-53. PubMed ID: 21722190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW; An CH; Jeong SH; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21435010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.
Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluations of bone tissue integration to pure and alloyed titanium implants.
Stenport VF; Johansson CB
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Sep; 10(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 18241219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of non-washed resorbable blasting media and alumina-blasted/acid-etched surfaces.
Coelho PG; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Suzuki M; Bonfante EA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 21435012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved osseointegration and interlocking capacity with dual acid-treated implants: a rabbit study.
Halldin A; Jimbo R; Johansson CB; Gretzer C; Jacobsson M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jan; 27(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25349918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Bonfante EA; Pessoa RS; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Witek L; Suzuki M
J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 21054223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Removal torque and histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic grit-blasted/acid-etched and dual acid-etched implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Marin C; Granato R; Suzuki M; Gil JN; Piattelli A; Coelho PG
J Periodontol; 2008 Oct; 79(10):1942-9. PubMed ID: 18834250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of surface modifications on early bone healing around plateau root form implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Suzuki M; Calasans-Maia MD; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Granjeiro JM; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1631-8. PubMed ID: 20430505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants.
Sul YT; Kwon DH; Kang BS; Oh SJ; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():8-19. PubMed ID: 22093014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
Gottlow J; Barkarmo S; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e204-12. PubMed ID: 22487460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
