BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21722886)

  • 1. Classification of benign and malignant masses based on Zernike moments.
    Tahmasbi A; Saki F; Shokouhi SB
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Aug; 41(8):726-35. PubMed ID: 21722886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast opposite weight learning rules with application in breast cancer diagnosis.
    Saki F; Tahmasbi A; Soltanian-Zadeh H; Shokouhi SB
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Jan; 43(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 23182603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Improved CAD System for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on Generalized Pseudo-Zernike Moment and Ada-DEWNN Classifier.
    Singh SP; Urooj S
    J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):105. PubMed ID: 26892455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of mammographic masses using a gradient-based segmentation algorithm and a neural classifier.
    Delogu P; Evelina Fantacci M; Kasae P; Retico A
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1479-91. PubMed ID: 17383623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
    Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A ranklet-based image representation for mass classification in digital mammograms.
    Masotti M
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3951-61. PubMed ID: 17089857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deep feature-based automatic classification of mammograms.
    Arora R; Rai PK; Raman B
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Jun; 58(6):1199-1211. PubMed ID: 32200453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast cancer CADx based on BI-RAds descriptors from two mammographic views.
    Gupta S; Chyn PF; Markey MK
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1810-7. PubMed ID: 16872088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classification of malignant and benign masses based on hybrid ART2LDA approach.
    Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Dec; 18(12):1178-87. PubMed ID: 10695530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design of a high-sensitivity classifier based on a genetic algorithm: application to computer-aided diagnosis.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Oct; 43(10):2853-71. PubMed ID: 9814523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the Mann-Whitney statistical test for feature selection: an approach in breast cancer diagnosis on mammography.
    Pérez NP; Guevara López MA; Silva A; Ramos I
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Jan; 63(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 25555756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.
    Varela C; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new approach to develop computer-aided diagnosis scheme of breast mass classification using deep learning technology.
    Qiu Y; Yan S; Gundreddy RR; Wang Y; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2017; 25(5):751-763. PubMed ID: 28436410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of dominant features on neural network performance in the classification of mammographic lesions.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Metz CE
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 44(10):2579-95. PubMed ID: 10533930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multiple circular path convolution neural network system for detection of mammographic masses.
    Lo SC; Li H; Wang Y; Kinnard L; Freedman MT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Feb; 21(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 11929102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses.
    Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Gurcan M
    Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2309-17. PubMed ID: 11764038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of masses in mammogram images using CNN, geostatistic functions and SVM.
    Sampaio WB; Diniz EM; Silva AC; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Aug; 41(8):653-64. PubMed ID: 21703605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fissures segmentation using surface features: content-based retrieval for mammographic mass using ensemble classifier.
    Liu H; Lan Y; Xu X; Song E; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1475-84. PubMed ID: 22055794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of feature selection methods on computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms.
    Hupse R; Karssemeijer N
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 May; 55(10):2893-904. PubMed ID: 20427855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.