These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21723125)

  • 1. A chimpanzee recognizes synthetic speech with significantly reduced acoustic cues to phonetic content.
    Heimbauer LA; Beran MJ; Owren MJ
    Curr Biol; 2011 Jul; 21(14):1210-4. PubMed ID: 21723125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A chimpanzee recognizes varied acoustical versions of sine-wave and noise-vocoded speech.
    Heimbauer LA; Beran MJ; Owren MJ
    Anim Cogn; 2021 Jul; 24(4):843-854. PubMed ID: 33555417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of degraded speech by chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger): Word-level stimulus generalization.
    Shofner WP; Yacko N; Bowdrie K
    J Comp Psychol; 2019 Aug; 133(3):326-339. PubMed ID: 30589293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Errors on a Speech-in-Babble Sentence Recognition Test Reveal Individual Differences in Acoustic Phonetic Perception and Babble Misallocations.
    Bernstein LE; Eberhardt SP; Auer ET
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):673-690. PubMed ID: 33928926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Degraded and computer-generated speech processing in a bonobo.
    Lahiff NJ; Slocombe KE; Taglialatela J; Dellwo V; Townsend SW
    Anim Cogn; 2022 Dec; 25(6):1393-1398. PubMed ID: 35595881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual Variability in Recalibrating to Spectrally Shifted Speech: Implications for Cochlear Implants.
    Smith ML; Winn MB
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1412-1427. PubMed ID: 33795617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toddlers' recognition of noise-vocoded speech.
    Newman R; Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):483-94. PubMed ID: 23297920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception: a language-trained chimpanzee weighs in.
    Fitch WT
    Curr Biol; 2011 Jul; 21(14):R543-6. PubMed ID: 21783032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cantonese Tone Perception for Children Who Use a Hearing Aid and a Cochlear Implant in Opposite Ears.
    Mok M; Holt CM; Lee KYS; Dowell RC; Vogel AP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e359-e368. PubMed ID: 28678079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.
    Mc Laughlin M; Reilly RB; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1546-60. PubMed ID: 23464025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of exclusion by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) during speech perception and auditory-visual matching-to-sample.
    Beran MJ
    Behav Processes; 2010 Mar; 83(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 20117192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.
    Sheffield BM; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):518-30. PubMed ID: 22280613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and validation of the Mandarin disyllable recognition test.
    Zhu M; Wang X; Fu QJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 132(8):855-61. PubMed ID: 22768800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the function of phonetic perceptual phenomena within speech recognition: an examination of the perception of /d/-/t/ by adult cochlear implant users.
    Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1056-64. PubMed ID: 12597198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of pragmatic and phonetic cues in spoken word recognition.
    Rohde H; Ettlinger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):967-83. PubMed ID: 22250908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.