BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21723728)

  • 1. Clustered microcalcifications of intermediate concern detected on digital mammography: ultrasound assessment.
    Yu PC; Lee YW; Chou FF; Wu SC; Huang CC; Ng SH; Sheen-Chen SM; Ko SF
    Breast; 2011 Dec; 20(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 21723728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
    Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.
    Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Jang M; Chang JM; Chung SY
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications.
    Moon WK; Im JG; Koh YH; Noh DY; Park IA
    Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):849-54. PubMed ID: 11110953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quantitative analysis of the spatial relationships of grouped microcalcifications demonstrated on xeromammography in benign and malignant breast disease.
    Hansell DM; Cooke JC; Parsons CA; Evans SH; Dance DR; Bliss JM; Llesley I
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):21-5. PubMed ID: 2832028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study.
    Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL; Vo TT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):1007-15. PubMed ID: 11906892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Impact of digital mammography in the detection and management of microcalcifications].
    Mellado M; Osa AM; Murillo A; Bermejo R; Burguete A; Pons MJ; Erdozain N
    Radiologia; 2013; 55(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22015223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast.
    Nagashima T; Hashimoto H; Oshida K; Nakano S; Tanabe N; Nikaido T; Koda K; Miyazaki M
    Breast Cancer; 2005; 12(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16110292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tungsten particles mimicking the microcalcifications seen in ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Bessell-Browne R; Beer T; Wylie E
    Australas Radiol; 2006 Feb; 50(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 16499738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer associated with isolated clustered microcalcifications, mammographically identified.
    Ranieri E; D'Andrea MR; D'Alessio A; Bergomi S; Caprio G; Calabrese GB; Virno F
    Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(4A):2831-5. PubMed ID: 9252725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of microcalcifications in women with dense breasts and hypoechoic focal lesions: comparison of mammography and ultrasound.
    Grigoryev M; Thomas A; Plath L; Durmus T; Slowinski T; Diekmann F; Fischer T
    Ultraschall Med; 2014 Dec; 35(6):554-60. PubMed ID: 24871694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microcalcifications of non-palpable breast lesions detected by ultrasonography: correlation with mammography and histopathology.
    Huang CS; Wu CY; Chu JS; Lin JH; Hsu SM; Chang KJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 13(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 10423808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of high resolution ultrasound complementary to digital mammography.
    Gupta K; Sandhu P; Arora S; Bedi G
    Ann Afr Med; 2018; 17(3):117-124. PubMed ID: 30185680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Case Series of Malign Hyperechoic Breast Lesions.
    Yilmaz TF; Sari L; Temur HO; Toprak H; Yildiz Ş
    Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):766-773. PubMed ID: 32723248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Radiologic-histopathologic correlation of microcalcifications from 11g vacuum biopsy: analysis of 3196 core biopsies].
    Fischmann A; Pietsch-Breitfeld B; Müller-Schimpfle M; Siegmann K; Wersebe A; Rothenberger-Janzen K; Claussen CD; Janzen J
    Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 15088178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occurrence and positive predictive value of additional nonmass findings for risk stratification of breast microcalcifications in mammography.
    Rominger MB; Sax EV; Figiel JH; Timmesfeld N
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2013 Nov; 64(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 23298860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occult malignant breast lesions in 114 patients: relationship to age and the presence of microcalcifications.
    Hermann G; Janus C; Schwartz IS; Papatestas A; Hermann DG; Rabinowitz JG
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):321-4. PubMed ID: 2845470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy.
    Cheung YC; Wan YL; Chen SC; Lui KW; Ng SH; Yeow KM; Lee KF; Hsueh S
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2002; 30(6):323-31. PubMed ID: 12116093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.