These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21723773)

  • 1. Large-scale integrated super-computing platform for next generation virtual drug discovery.
    Mitchell W; Matsumoto S
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2011 Aug; 15(4):553-9. PubMed ID: 21723773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physics-based scoring of protein-ligand interactions: explicit polarizability, quantum mechanics and free energies.
    Bryce RA
    Future Med Chem; 2011 Apr; 3(6):683-98. PubMed ID: 21554075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binding Free Energy Calculation Using Quantum Mechanics Aimed for Drug Lead Optimization.
    Cavasotto CN
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2114():257-268. PubMed ID: 32016898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Post processing of protein-compound docking for fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD): in-silico structure-based drug screening and ligand-binding pose prediction.
    Fukunishi Y
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2010; 10(6):680-94. PubMed ID: 20337587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward High-Throughput Predictive Modeling of Protein Binding/Unbinding Kinetics.
    Chiu SH; Xie L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1164-74. PubMed ID: 27159844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational approach to de novo discovery of fragment binding for novel protein states.
    Konteatis ZD; Klon AE; Zou J; Meshkat S
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 493():357-80. PubMed ID: 21371598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performing an In Silico Repurposing of Existing Drugs by Combining Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics Simulation.
    Sohraby F; Bagheri M; Aryapour H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1903():23-43. PubMed ID: 30547434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computational Methods Used in Hit-to-Lead and Lead Optimization Stages of Structure-Based Drug Discovery.
    Heifetz A; Southey M; Morao I; Townsend-Nicholson A; Bodkin MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():375-394. PubMed ID: 29188574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rigorous Free Energy Simulations in Virtual Screening.
    Cournia Z; Allen BK; Beuming T; Pearlman DA; Radak BK; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4153-4169. PubMed ID: 32539386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
    Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic Docking: A Paradigm Shift in Computational Drug Discovery.
    Gioia D; Bertazzo M; Recanatini M; Masetti M; Cavalli A
    Molecules; 2017 Nov; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 29165360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field.
    Wang L; Wu Y; Deng Y; Kim B; Pierce L; Krilov G; Lupyan D; Robinson S; Dahlgren MK; Greenwood J; Romero DL; Masse C; Knight JL; Steinbrecher T; Beuming T; Damm W; Harder E; Sherman W; Brewer M; Wester R; Murcko M; Frye L; Farid R; Lin T; Mobley DL; Jorgensen WL; Berne BJ; Friesner RA; Abel R
    J Am Chem Soc; 2015 Feb; 137(7):2695-703. PubMed ID: 25625324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molecular Dynamics as a Tool for Virtual Ligand Screening.
    Menchon G; Maveyraud L; Czaplicki G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():145-178. PubMed ID: 29594772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-performance drug discovery: computational screening by combining docking and molecular dynamics simulations.
    Okimoto N; Futatsugi N; Fuji H; Suenaga A; Morimoto G; Yanai R; Ohno Y; Narumi T; Taiji M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Oct; 5(10):e1000528. PubMed ID: 19816553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absolute Alchemical Free Energy Calculations for Ligand Binding: A Beginner's Guide.
    Aldeghi M; Bluck JP; Biggin PC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():199-232. PubMed ID: 29594774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of the differences in activity between hydroxycycloalkyl N1 substituted pyrazole derivatives as inhibitors of B-Raf kinase by using docking, molecular dynamics, QM/MM, and fragment-based de novo design: study of binding mode of diastereomer compounds.
    Caballero J; Alzate-Morales JH; Vergara-Jaque A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2920-31. PubMed ID: 22011048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding constants with the molecular dynamics free energy perturbation method.
    Woo HJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 443():109-20. PubMed ID: 18446284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
    Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.