These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results. MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial. Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible]. Cune MS; van Kampen FM; van der Bilt A Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2006 Oct; 113(10):401-7. PubMed ID: 17058761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets. Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction. De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures. Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A quality-of-life comparison between self-aligning and ball attachment systems for 2-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. Bilhan H; Geckili O; Sulun T; Bilgin T J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():167-73. PubMed ID: 20662674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results. Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts. Weinländer M; Piehslinger E; Krennmair G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 20556260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers. Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e618-23. PubMed ID: 21726276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Walton JN; MacEntee MI; Glick N Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 12074455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correction of nonparallel implants for an implant-retained overdenture. Nunes DB; da Silva P; Pereira-Cenci T; Garbin CA; Schuh C; Boscato N Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):e168-71. PubMed ID: 20591765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. Payne AG; Solomons YF Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 11203640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types. van der Bilt A; van Kampen FM; Cune MS Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16776767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study. Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: the influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters. Oetterli M; Kiener P; Mericske-Stern R Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 12066700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]