128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21724119)
1. Impact of different window settings on colon polyp measurements with CT virtual colonoscopy: a phantom study.
Wu XW; Wang WQ; Xu JM; Liu B
Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 21724119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.
Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings.
Bräuer C; Lefere P; Gryspeerdt S; Ringl H; Al-Mukhtar A; Apfaltrer P; Berzaczy D; Füger B; Furtner J; Müller-Mang C; Pones M; Scharitzer M; Woitek R; Graser A; Weber M; Mang T
Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4766-4774. PubMed ID: 29761359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A straightforward approach to computer-aided polyp detection using a polyp-specific volumetric feature in CT colonography.
Lee JG; Hyo Kim J; Hyung Kim S; Sun Park H; Ihn Choi B
Comput Biol Med; 2011 Sep; 41(9):790-801. PubMed ID: 21762887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of spatial resolution and tube current on computer-aided detection of polyps on CT colonographic images: phantom study.
Kim SH; Lee JM; Shin CI; Kim HC; Lee JG; Kim JH; Choi JY; Eun HW; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi BI
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):492-503. PubMed ID: 18539892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT colonography: automatic measurement of polyp diameter compared with manual assessment - an in-vivo study.
Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME
Clin Radiol; 2007 Feb; 62(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 17207697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT colonography predictably overestimates colonic length and distance to polyps compared with optical colonoscopy.
Duncan JE; McNally MP; Sweeney WB; Gentry AB; Barlow DS; Jensen DW; Cash BD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1291-5. PubMed ID: 19843744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colorectal polyp detection with virtual colonoscopy (computed tomographic colonography); the reliability of the method.
Xynopoulos D; Stasinopoulou M; Dimitroulopoulos D; Tsamakides K; Arhavlis E; Kontou M; Tavernaraki A; Paraskevas E
Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(43):124-7. PubMed ID: 11941935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography for polyp detection.
Dachman AH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1289-90. PubMed ID: 19843743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of colonic polyps by radiologists and endoscopists: who is most accurate?
Punwani S; Halligan S; Irving P; Bloom S; Bungay A; Greenhalgh R; Godbold J; Taylor SA; Altman DG
Eur Radiol; 2008 May; 18(5):874-81. PubMed ID: 18176807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of 3D surface fitting for robust polyp detection and classification in CT colonography.
Chowdhury TA; Whelan PF; Ghita O
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Dec; 30(8):427-36. PubMed ID: 16919911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of flat colorectal polyps at screening CT colonography in comparison with conventional polypoid lesions.
Sakamoto T; Mitsuzaki K; Utsunomiya D; Matsuda K; Yamamura S; Urata J; Kawakami M; Yamashita Y
Acta Radiol; 2012 Sep; 53(7):714-9. PubMed ID: 22821957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.
Yeshwant SC; Summers RM; Yao J; Brickman DS; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 17114627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated polyp measurement with CT colonography: preliminary observations in a phantom colon model.
Fletcher JG; Booya F; Melton Z; Johnson K; Guendel L; Schmidt B; McCollough CH; Young B; Fidler JL; Harmsen WS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Apr; 188(4):945-52. PubMed ID: 17377028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT colonography: determination of optimal CT technique using a novel colon phantom.
Johnson KT; Johnson CD; Anderson SM; Bruesewitz MR; Mccollough CH
Abdom Imaging; 2004; 29(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15290942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An improved electronic colon cleansing method for detection of colonic polyps by virtual colonoscopy.
Wang Z; Liang Z; Li X; Li L; Li B; Eremina D; Lu H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1635-46. PubMed ID: 16916098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT colonography using 360-degree virtual dissection: a feasibility study.
Johnson KT; Johnson CD; Fletcher JG; MacCarty RL; Summers RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 16357384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
