These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21724355)
1. Interobserver agreement for sonograms of breast lesions obtained by an automated breast volume scanner. Zhang J; Lai XJ; Zhu QL; Wang HY; Jiang YX; Liu H; Dai Q; You SS; Xiao MS; Sun Q Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2179-83. PubMed ID: 21724355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results. Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Agreement Between an Automated Volume Breast Scanner and Handheld Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Examinations. Barr RG; DeVita R; Destounis S; Manzoni F; De Silvestri A; Tinelli C J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 28569407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound. Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound. Choi EJ; Choi H; Park EH; Song JS; Youk JH Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():138-145. PubMed ID: 29362145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses. Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of retraction phenomenon and BI-RADS-US descriptors in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses using an automated breast volume scanner. Zheng FY; Yan LX; Huang BJ; Xia HS; Wang X; Lu Q; Li CX; Wang WP Eur J Radiol; 2015 Nov; 84(11):2123-9. PubMed ID: 26272029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnostic value of automated breast volume scanner in high-risk and small breast lesions]. Su KL; Xu HB; Zhang ZX; Pan N; He JL; Hu ZJ; Yang OO; Luo H; Yang HF; Liu LL Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 35(9):703-7. PubMed ID: 24332060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Abdullah N; Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Kao E Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):665-72. PubMed ID: 19567644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis: interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization. Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Park JH; Lee KE; Kim JH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):747-54. PubMed ID: 21862820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated Breast Volume Scanning: Identifying 3-D Coronal Plane Imaging Features May Help Categorize Complex Cysts. Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Xiao MS; Liu H; Dai Q; Li JC; Sun Q Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):689-98. PubMed ID: 26742895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound. Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated breast volume scanning versus conventional ultrasound in breast cancer screening. Xiao Y; Zhou Q; Chen Z Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 25620036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations. Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance and inter-observer concordance in lesion detection with the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS). Wojcinski S; Gyapong S; Farrokh A; Soergel P; Hillemanns P; Degenhardt F BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 13():36. PubMed ID: 24219312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening. Hellgren R; Dickman P; Leifland K; Saracco A; Hall P; Celebioglu F Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 27565633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound. Kotsianos-Hermle D; Hiltawsky KM; Wirth S; Fischer T; Friese K; Reiser M Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 18468829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in assessing breast cancer size: A comparison with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Linda A; Lorenzon M; Zuiani C Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1000-1008. PubMed ID: 29018952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]