These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21724355)

  • 21. A novel application of the Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS) in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors.
    Chen T; Gao H; Guo W; Qing X; Gao K; Yu J; Deng Y
    Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 25667066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. CAD algorithms for solid breast masses discrimination: evaluation of the accuracy and interobserver variability.
    Wang Y; Jiang S; Wang H; Guo YH; Liu B; Hou Y; Cheng H; Tian J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 20691917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
    Kim H; Cha JH; Oh HY; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
    Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 23086698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of an automated breast volume ultrasound system for assessment of the pre-operative extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison with a conventional handheld ultrasound examination.
    Li N; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Yang Q; Wang HY; Lai XJ; Sun Q
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2255-63. PubMed ID: 24035630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Observer agreement using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-ultrasound, First Edition (2003).
    Park CS; Lee JH; Yim HW; Kang BJ; Kim HS; Jung JI; Jung NY; Kim SH
    Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 17923782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions.
    Park CS; Kim SH; Jung NY; Choi JJ; Kang BJ; Jung HS
    Breast Cancer; 2015 Mar; 22(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 23584596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Initial results of the FUSION-X-US prototype combining 3D automated breast ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Schaefgen B; Heil J; Barr RG; Radicke M; Harcos A; Gomez C; Stieber A; Hennigs A; von Au A; Spratte J; Rauch G; Rom J; Schütz F; Sohn C; Golatta M
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 29302784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets].
    Fischer T; Filimonow S; Hamm B; Slowinski T; Thomas A
    Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1224-34. PubMed ID: 17136646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Volume Scanning (ABVS) Compared to Handheld Ultrasonography With Breast MRI as the Gold Standard.
    Schmachtenberg C; Fischer T; Hamm B; Bick U
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):954-961. PubMed ID: 28336007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Three-Dimensional Assessment of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Compared with Handheld Ultrasound in Pre-Operative Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinomas: A Pilot Study of 51 Cases.
    Xu C; Wei S; Xie Y; Guan X; Yang B
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2089-96. PubMed ID: 27339762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
    Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 1000-Case Reader Study of Radiologists' Performance in Interpretation of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Images with a Computer-Aided Detection System.
    Xu X; Bao L; Tan Y; Zhu L; Kong F; Wang W
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1694-1702. PubMed ID: 29853222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) versus hand-held ultrasound as a second look procedure after magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3767-3775. PubMed ID: 28120030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. First clinical use of a standardized three-dimensional ultrasound for breast imaging.
    Kotsianos-Hermle D; Wirth S; Fischer T; Hiltawsky KM; Reiser M
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 18479867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Simple rules for ultrasonographic subcategorization of BI-RADS®-US 4 breast masses.
    Jales RM; Sarian LO; Torresan R; Marussi EF; Alvares BR; Derchain S
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1231-5. PubMed ID: 23540948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic value of an automated breast volume scanner for abdominal hernias.
    Diao X; Chen Y; Qiu Z; Pang Y; Zhan J; Chen L
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 24371097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intensity-Invariant Texture Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses.
    Lo CM; Moon WK; Huang CS; Chen JH; Yang MC; Chang RF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2039-48. PubMed ID: 25843514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of logistic regression analysis and an artificial neural network using the BI-RADS lexicon for ultrasonography in conjunction with introbserver variability.
    Kim SM; Han H; Park JM; Choi YJ; Yoon HS; Sohn JH; Baek MH; Kim YN; Chae YM; June JJ; Lee J; Jeon YH
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):599-606. PubMed ID: 22270787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment.
    Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Soo MS; Walsh R; Mengoni P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1621-5. PubMed ID: 10350302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.