341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21724357)
1. Evaluation of tomosynthesis elastography in a breast-mimicking phantom.
Engelken FJ; Sack I; Klatt D; Fischer T; Fallenberg EM; Bick U; Diekmann F
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2169-73. PubMed ID: 21724357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel breast software phantom for biomechanical modeling of elastography.
Bhatti SN; Sridhar-Keralapura M
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1748-68. PubMed ID: 22482599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calculation of strain images of a breast-mimicking phantom from 3D CT image data.
Kim JG; Aowlad Hossain AB; Shin JH; Lee SY
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5469-78. PubMed ID: 22957614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic frame pairing in real-time freehand elastography.
Xia R; Tao G; Thittai AK
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jun; 61(6):979-85. PubMed ID: 24859661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-cost quasi-real-time elastography using B-mode ultrasound images.
Kwon HJ; Lee J
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(4):1673-92. PubMed ID: 24948452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel fast full inversion based breast ultrasound elastography technique.
Karimi H; Fenster A; Samani A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):2219-33. PubMed ID: 23475227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Silicone breast phantoms for elastographic imaging evaluation.
Kashif AS; Lotz TF; McGarry MD; Pattison AJ; Chase JG
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063503. PubMed ID: 23718614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast elasticity: principles, technique, results: an update and overview of commercially available software.
Balleyguier C; Canale S; Ben Hassen W; Vielh P; Bayou EH; Mathieu MC; Uzan C; Bourgier C; Dromain C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 22445593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study of ultrasound stiffness imaging methods using tissue mimicking phantoms.
Manickam K; Machireddy RR; Seshadri S
Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):621-31. PubMed ID: 24083832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ex vivo and in vivo assessment of the non-linearity of elasticity properties of breast tissues for quantitative strain elastography.
Umemoto T; Ueno E; Matsumura T; Yamakawa M; Bando H; Mitake T; Shiina T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1755-68. PubMed ID: 24802305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D estimation of soft biological tissue deformation from radio-frequency ultrasound volume acquisitions.
Deprez JF; Brusseau E; Schmitt C; Cloutier G; Basset O
Med Image Anal; 2009 Feb; 13(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 18823814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Axial-shear strain distributions in an elliptical inclusion model: experimental validation and in vivo examples with implications to breast tumor classification.
Thittai AK; Galaz B; Ophir J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 May; 36(5):814-20. PubMed ID: 20420971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography.
Thomas A; Degenhardt F; Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Slowinski T; Fischer T
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 20171905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3-D visualization and non-linear tissue classification of breast tumors using ultrasound elastography in vivo.
Sayed A; Layne G; Abraham J; Mukdadi OM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1490-502. PubMed ID: 24768484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Building a virtual simulation platform for quasistatic breast ultrasound elastography using open source software: A preliminary investigation.
Wang Y; Helminen E; Jiang J
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5453-66. PubMed ID: 26328994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Freehand real-time elastography: impact of scanning parameters on image quality and in vitro intra- and interobserver validations.
Havre RF; Elde E; Gilja OH; Odegaard S; Eide GE; Matre K; Nesje LB
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1638-50. PubMed ID: 18524458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elastography ultrasound and questionable breast lesions: does it count?
Mansour SM; Omar OS
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3234-44. PubMed ID: 22591761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of focal breast lesions by means of elastography.
Fischer T; Sack I; Thomas A
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):816-23. PubMed ID: 23888477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
