126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21724457)
1. Rate of detection of high-risk HPV with two assays in women ≥ 30 years of age.
Quigley NB; Potter NT; Chivukula M; Knight MZ; Welch JR; Olson MC
J Clin Virol; 2011 Sep; 52(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 21724457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A population-based observational study comparing Cervista and Hybrid Capture 2 methods: improved relative specificity of the Cervista assay by increasing its cut-off.
Boehmer G; Wang L; Iftner A; Holz B; Haedicke J; von Wasielewski R; Martus P; Iftner T
BMC Infect Dis; 2014 Dec; 14():674. PubMed ID: 25487281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervista HPV HR test for cervical cancer screening: a comparative study in the Catalonian population.
Alameda F; Garrote L; Mojal S; Sousa C; Muset M; LLoveras B; Bellosillo B; Saldanha C; Carreras R; Serrano S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 139(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 25611107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance characteristics of the Cervista HPV HR test kit in cervical cancer screening in China.
Zhao J; Zhang X; Ma J; Liu G; Yao D; Zhang W; Wang J; Wei L; Zhao Y; Zeng Y; Liao Q
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2012 Oct; 16(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 23023138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervista HR and HPV 16/18 assays vs hybrid capture 2 assay: outcome comparison in women with negative cervical cytology.
Kurian EM; Caporelli ML; Baker S; Woda B; Cosar EF; Hutchinson L
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Nov; 136(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 22031321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of cobas 4800 HPV assay in SurePath Papanicolaou specimens for cervical cancer screening.
Guo M; Shlyakhova N; Khanna A; Tinnirello AA; Schmeler KM; Hwang J; Sturgis EM; Stewart J
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 33967024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of positive screening test results and agreement between cytology and human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical cancer screening in North-Western Romania.
Şuteu O; Blaga ML; Nygård M; Leinonen MK; Nicula F; Păiş R; Coza D; Cadariu PA; Melnic A; Andreassen T; Hashim D; Weiderpass E
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Mar; 29(2):141-148. PubMed ID: 31033568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Aptima and Cervista tests for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus in cervical cytology specimens.
Nolte FS; Ribeiro-Nesbitt DG
Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Oct; 142(4):561-6. PubMed ID: 25239425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of the cervista and hybrid capture 2 methods in detecting high-risk human papillomavirus in cervical lesions.
Tao K; Yang J; Yang H; Guo ZH; Hu YM; Tan ZY; Zhang F; Duan JL
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Mar; 42(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 23904341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of careHPV, Cervista Human Papillomavirus, and Hybrid Capture 2 Methods in Diagnosing Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2+ in Xinjiang Uyghur Women.
Tuerxun G; Yukesaier A; Lu L; Aierken K; Mijiti P; Jiang Y; Abulizi A; Zhang Y; Abuduxikuer G; Abulizi G; Li H
Oncologist; 2016 Jul; 21(7):825-31. PubMed ID: 27317575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long term results of follow-up after HPV self-sampling with devices Qvintip and HerSwab in women non-attending cervical screening programme.
Bokan T; Ivanus U; Jerman T; Takac I; Arko D
Radiol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 55(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 33764704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. HPV Prevalence in the Dutch cervical cancer screening population (DuSC study): HPV testing using automated HC2, cobas and Aptima workflows.
Huijsmans CJ; Geurts-Giele WR; Leeijen C; Hazenberg HL; van Beek J; de Wild C; van der Linden JC; van den Brule AJ
BMC Cancer; 2016 Nov; 16(1):922. PubMed ID: 27894291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk-adapted primary HPV cervical cancer screening project in Wolfsburg, Germany--experience over 3 years.
Luyten A; Scherbring S; Reinecke-Lüthge A; Braun BE; Pietralla M; Theiler K; Petry KU
J Clin Virol; 2009 Nov; 46 Suppl 3():S5-10. PubMed ID: 20129072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.
Koliopoulos G; Nyaga VN; Santesso N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Mustafa RA; Schünemann H; Paraskevaidis E; Arbyn M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD008587. PubMed ID: 28796882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate histopathologic follow-up of cervista and aptima high-risk HPV assays in women with LSIL cytology.
Zhang H; Varma KR; Han M; Matsko J; Zhao C
Cancer Cytopathol; 2018 Aug; 126(8):525-532. PubMed ID: 29797678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the Cervista HPV HR test and Hybrid Capture 2 assay in a Dutch screening population: improved specificity of the Cervista HPV HR test by changing the cut-off.
Boers A; Slagter-Menkema L; van Hemel BM; Belinson JL; Ruitenbeek T; Buikema HJ; Klip H; Ghyssaert H; van der Zee AG; de Bock GH; Wisman GB; Schuuring E
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101930. PubMed ID: 25051098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary cervical cancer screening and triage using an mRNA human papillomavirus assay and visual inspection.
Nieves L; Enerson CL; Belinson S; Brainard J; Chiesa-Vottero A; Nagore N; Booth C; Pérez AG; Chávez-Avilés MN; Belinson J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Mar; 23(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 23334437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Aptima and hybrid capture-2 HPV tests and Pap test in the referral population in Japan.
Kuroki H; Sakamoto J; Shibata T; Takakura M; Sasagawa T
J Med Virol; 2021 Aug; 93(8):5076-5083. PubMed ID: 33634473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.
Leinonen M; Nieminen P; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Tarkkanen J; Laurila P; Anttila A
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Dec; 101(23):1612-23. PubMed ID: 19903804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
