These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21724567)

  • 1. Binocular and monocular depth cues in online feedback control of 3D pointing movement.
    Hu B; Knill DC
    J Vis; 2011 Jun; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 21724567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.
    Grant S; Conway ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1239-1255. PubMed ID: 30850853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.
    Grant S
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3489-505. PubMed ID: 26298046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Viewing geometry determines the contribution of binocular vision to the online control of grasping.
    Keefe BD; Watt SJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Dec; 235(12):3631-3643. PubMed ID: 28900689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Monocular Spatial Cues on Vergence Eye Movements in Monocular and Binocular Viewing of 3-D and 2-D Stimuli.
    Batvinionak AA; Gracheva MA; Bolshakov AS; Rozhkova GI
    Perception; 2015; 44(8-9):1077-84. PubMed ID: 26562921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Slant cues are processed with different latencies for the online control of movement.
    van Mierlo CM; Louw S; Smeets JB; Brenner E
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):25.1-8. PubMed ID: 19757964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reaching for visual cues to depth: the brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception.
    Knill DC
    J Vis; 2005 Feb; 5(2):103-15. PubMed ID: 15831071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of monocular viewing on hand-eye coordination during sequential grasping and placing movements.
    Gonzalez DA; Niechwiej-Szwedo E
    Vision Res; 2016 Nov; 128():30-38. PubMed ID: 27664351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis.
    Servos P; Goodale MA; Jakobson LS
    Vision Res; 1992 Aug; 32(8):1513-21. PubMed ID: 1455724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of scene-relative object movement: Optic flow parsing and the contribution of monocular depth cues.
    Warren PA; Rushton SK
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1406-19. PubMed ID: 19480063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping.
    Marotta JJ; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Aug; 121(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 9746154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of feedback in the accuracy of perceived direction of motion-in-depth and control of interceptive action.
    Gray R; Regan D; Castaneda B; Sieffert R
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1676-94. PubMed ID: 16169039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of head movements in the control of manual prehension.
    Marotta JJ; Kruyer A; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 May; 120(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 9628412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motion parallax enables depth processing for action in a visual form agnosic when binocular vision is unavailable.
    Dijkerman HC; Milner AD; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Dec; 37(13):1505-10. PubMed ID: 10617271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual depth processing in Williams-Beuren syndrome.
    Van der Geest JN; Lagers-van Haselen GC; van Hagen JM; Brenner E; Govaerts LC; de Coo IF; Frens MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(2):200-9. PubMed ID: 15965761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Depth-cue integration in grasp programming: no evidence for a binocular specialism.
    Keefe BD; Hibbard PB; Watt SJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):1246-1257. PubMed ID: 21371484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian model of binocular perception of 3D mirror symmetrical polyhedra.
    Li Y; Sawada T; Shi Y; Kwon T; Pizlo Z
    J Vis; 2011 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 21505106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monocular and binocular control of human interceptive movements.
    Servos P; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Mar; 119(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 9521540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reach-to-grasp movements.
    Jackson SR; Newport R; Shaw A
    Curr Biol; 2002 Feb; 12(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 11839278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.