These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21725262)

  • 1. Subperiosteal temporal pocket versus standard technique in cochlear implantation: a comparative clinical study.
    Güldiken Y; Orhan KS; Yiğit O; Başaran B; Polat B; Güneş S; Acoğlu E; Değer K
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Aug; 32(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 21725262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The temporalis pocket technique for cochlear implantation: an anatomic and clinical study.
    Balkany TJ; Whitley M; Shapira Y; Angeli SI; Brown K; Eter E; Van De Water T; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Treaba C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):903-7. PubMed ID: 19730145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 228 cases of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator placement in a tight subperiosteal pocket without fixation.
    Sweeney AD; Carlson ML; Valenzuela CV; Wanna GB; Rivas A; Bennett ML; Haynes DS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Apr; 152(4):712-7. PubMed ID: 25605691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear implant fixation using a subperiosteal tight pocket without either suture or bone-recess technique.
    Jethanamest D; Channer GA; Moss WJ; Lustig LR; Telischi FF
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jul; 124(7):1674-7. PubMed ID: 24114870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimal access cochlear implant fixation: temporalis pocket with a plate.
    Shelton C; Warren FM
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1530-4. PubMed ID: 23064385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive cochlear implantation with mastoidal three-layer flap technique.
    Ulug T; Teker AM
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(5):292-8. PubMed ID: 19923871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiologic Evidence of Cochlear Implant Bone Bed Formation Following the Subperiosteal Temporal Pocket Technique.
    Turanoglu AK; Yigit O; Acioglu E; Okbay AM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Apr; 154(4):702-6. PubMed ID: 26884370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimal access and standard cochlear implantation: a comparative study.
    Prager JD; Neidich MJ; Perkins JN; Meinzen-Derr J; Greinwald JH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 76(8):1102-6. PubMed ID: 22595461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The suprameatal approach: a safe alternative surgical technique for cochlear implantation.
    Postelmans JT; Tange RA; Stokroos RJ; Grolman W
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 20009783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of cochlear implant bed preparation and fixation technique on the revision cochlear implantation rate.
    Pamuk AE; Pamuk G; Jafarov S; Bajin MD; Saraç S; Sennaroğlu L
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):534-539. PubMed ID: 29888692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of receiver-stimulator migration in cochlear implantation using the subperiosteal pocket technique: a prospective clinical study.
    Güldiken Y; Polat B; Enver N; Aydemir L; Çomoğlu Ş; Orhan KS
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Jun; 131(6):487-491. PubMed ID: 28290917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tailed Palva flap in the subperiosteal pocket technique for cochlear implantation.
    Orhan KS; Polat B; Enver N; Güldiken Y
    J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Sep; 129(9):916-8. PubMed ID: 26314323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implantation in patients with substantial residual hearing.
    Cullen RD; Higgins C; Buss E; Clark M; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Dec; 114(12):2218-23. PubMed ID: 15564849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lack of financial barriers to pediatric cochlear implantation: impact of socioeconomic status on access and outcomes.
    Chang DT; Ko AB; Murray GS; Arnold JE; Megerian CA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jul; 136(7):648-57. PubMed ID: 20644058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical outcome after paediatric cochlear implantation: diminution of complications with the evolution of new surgical techniques.
    Gysin C; Papsin BC; Daya H; Nedzelski J
    J Otolaryngol; 2000 Oct; 29(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 11108487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Clarion Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant--surgical technique, complications, and results: a single institutional experience.
    Lalwani AK; Larky JB; Wareing MJ; Kwast K; Schindler RA
    Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 9455952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical outcomes of paediatric cochlear implantation: the Hospital for Sick Children's experience.
    de Jong AL; Nedzelski J; Papsin BC
    J Otolaryngol; 1998 Feb; 27(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 9511116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spontaneous bone bed formation in cochlear implantation using the subperiosteal pocket technique.
    Orhan KS; Polat B; Enver N; Çelik M; Güldiken Y; Değer K
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1752-4. PubMed ID: 25025535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.