888 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21725957)
1. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins.
Rasmussen LH; Lawaetz M; Bjoern L; Vennits B; Blemings A; Eklof B
Br J Surg; 2011 Aug; 98(8):1079-87. PubMed ID: 21725957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins (Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1079-1087).
Brittenden J
Br J Surg; 2011 Aug; 98(8):1088. PubMed ID: 21725958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and surgery for treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins with a 2-year follow-up.
Christenson JT; Gueddi S; Gemayel G; Bounameaux H
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 52(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 20801608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veins.
van der Velden SK; Biemans AA; De Maeseneer MG; Kockaert MA; Cuypers PW; Hollestein LM; Neumann HA; Nijsten T; van den Bos RR
Br J Surg; 2015 Sep; 102(10):1184-94. PubMed ID: 26132315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy versus surgery for the incompetent great saphenous vein.
Shadid N; Ceulen R; Nelemans P; Dirksen C; Veraart J; Schurink GW; van Neer P; vd Kley J; de Haan E; Sommer A
Br J Surg; 2012 Aug; 99(8):1062-70. PubMed ID: 22627969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices.
Nesbitt C; Bedenis R; Bhattacharya V; Stansby G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; (7):CD005624. PubMed ID: 25075589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein: analysis of early efficacy and complications.
Puggioni A; Kalra M; Carmo M; Mozes G; Gloviczki P
J Vasc Surg; 2005 Sep; 42(3):488-93. PubMed ID: 16171593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endovenous laser and echo-guided foam ablation in great saphenous vein reflux: one-year follow-up results.
Gonzalez-Zeh R; Armisen R; Barahona S
J Vasc Surg; 2008 Oct; 48(4):940-6. PubMed ID: 18639418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiofrequency minimally invasive endovascular treatment of lower limbs varicose veins: clinical experience and literature review.
Zan S; Contessa L; Varetto G; Barra C; Conforti M; Casella F; Rispoli P
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2007 Aug; 55(4):443-58. PubMed ID: 17653021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein with sapheno-femoral ligation compared to standard stripping: a prospective clinical study.
Liu X; Jia X; Guo W; Xiong J; Zhang H; Liu M; Du X; Zhang M
Int Angiol; 2011 Aug; 30(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 21747350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomised comparison of costs and cost-effectiveness of cryostripping and endovenous laser ablation for varicose veins: 2-year results.
Disselhoff BC; Buskens E; Kelder JC; der Kinderen DJ; Moll FL
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2009 Mar; 37(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 19111485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser ablation and surgery for varicose veins: results from the Comparison of LAser, Surgery and foam Sclerotherapy (CLASS) randomised controlled trial.
Brittenden J; Cotton SC; Elders A; Tassie E; Scotland G; Ramsay CR; Norrie J; Burr J; Francis J; Wileman S; Campbell B; Bachoo P; Chetter I; Gough M; Earnshaw J; Lees T; Scott J; Baker SA; MacLennan G; Prior M; Bolsover D; Campbell MK
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Apr; 19(27):1-342. PubMed ID: 25858333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with clinical and duplex outcome after 5 years.
Rasmussen L; Lawaetz M; Bjoern L; Blemings A; Eklof B
J Vasc Surg; 2013 Aug; 58(2):421-6. PubMed ID: 23768792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: short-term results.
Rasmussen LH; Bjoern L; Lawaetz M; Blemings A; Lawaetz B; Eklof B
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):308-15. PubMed ID: 17600655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience with concomitant ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy and endovenous laser treatment in chronic venous disorder and its influence on Health Related Quality of Life: interim analysis of more than 1000 consecutive procedures.
King T; Coulomb G; Goldman A; Sheen V; McWilliams S; Guptan RC
Int Angiol; 2009 Aug; 28(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 19648872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized clinical trial of VNUS ClosureFAST radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veins.
Shepherd AC; Gohel MS; Brown LC; Metcalfe MJ; Hamish M; Davies AH
Br J Surg; 2010 Jun; 97(6):810-8. PubMed ID: 20473992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparable effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation and high ligation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial (RELACS study).
Rass K; Frings N; Glowacki P; Hamsch C; Gräber S; Vogt T; Tilgen W
Arch Dermatol; 2012 Jan; 148(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 21931012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-utility analysis of great saphenous vein ablation with radiofrequency, foam and surgery in the emerging health-care setting of Thailand.
Siribumrungwong B; Noorit P; Wilasrusmee C; Leelahavarong P; Thakkinstian A; Teerawattananon Y
Phlebology; 2016 Sep; 31(8):573-81. PubMed ID: 26341394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endovenous laser ablation and foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins: does the presence of perforating vein insufficiency affect the treatment outcome?
Köroglu M; Eris HN; Aktas AR; Kayan M; Yeşildağ A; Cetin M; Parlak C; Gürses C; Akhan O
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):278-84. PubMed ID: 21498363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive techniques to manage varicose veins: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Carroll C; Hummel S; Leaviss J; Ren S; Stevens JW; Everson-Hock E; Cantrell A; Stevenson M; Michaels J
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Oct; 17(48):i-xvi, 1-141. PubMed ID: 24176098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
