790 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21726276)
1. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers.
Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e618-23. PubMed ID: 21726276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures.
Al-Zubeidi MI; Alsabeeha NH; Thomson WM; Payne AG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e11-9. PubMed ID: 21414137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
ELsyad MA
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of maximum bite force on patient satisfaction and quality of life of patients wearing mandibular implant overdentures.
Geckili O; Bilhan H; Mumcu E; Tuncer N
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 21189081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in impact of patient and prosthetic characteristics on oral health-related quality of life among implant-retained overdenture wearers.
Preciado A; Del Río J; Suárez-García MJ; Montero J; Lynch CD; Castillo-Oyagüe R
J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):857-65. PubMed ID: 22819956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome of implant-supported overdenture treatment--a survey of 58 patients.
Kuoppala R; Näpänkangas R; Raustia A
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e577-84. PubMed ID: 22616909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures.
Brennan M; Houston F; O'Sullivan M; O'Connell B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 20657876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A quality-of-life comparison between self-aligning and ball attachment systems for 2-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Bilhan H; Geckili O; Sulun T; Bilgin T
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():167-73. PubMed ID: 20662674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring patient-based outcomes: is treatment satisfaction associated with oral health-related quality of life?
Michaud PL; de Grandmont P; Feine JS; Emami E
J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):624-31. PubMed ID: 22522414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate functional loading of dental implants supporting a bar-retained maxillary overdenture: preliminary 12-month results.
Pieri F; Aldini NN; Fini M; Marchetti C; Corinaldesi G
J Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1883-93. PubMed ID: 19905959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effectiveness of 2-implant overdentures - a pragmatic international multicentre study.
Rashid F; Awad MA; Thomason JM; Piovano A; Spielberg GP; Scilingo E; Mojon P; Müller F; Spielberg M; Heydecke G; Stoker G; Wismeijer D; Allen F; Feine JS
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 38(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 20704639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate loading of two implants with a mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a new treatment protocol.
Stoker GT; Wismeijer D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 19681940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new, short, specific questionnaire (QoLIP-10) for evaluating the oral health-related quality of life of implant-retained overdenture and hybrid prosthesis wearers.
Preciado A; Del Río J; Lynch CD; Castillo-Oyagüe R
J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):753-63. PubMed ID: 23831418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
