135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21726551)
1. Heritability of ocular component dimensions in mice phenotyped using depth-enhanced swept source optical coherence tomography.
Wang L; Považay B; Chen YP; Hofer B; Drexler W; Guggenheim JA
Exp Eye Res; 2011 Oct; 93(4):482-90. PubMed ID: 21726551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biometric measurement of the mouse eye using optical coherence tomography with focal plane advancement.
Zhou X; Xie J; Shen M; Wang J; Jiang L; Qu J; Lu F
Vision Res; 2008 Apr; 48(9):1137-43. PubMed ID: 18346775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers.
Grulkowski I; Liu JJ; Zhang JY; Potsaid B; Jayaraman V; Cable AE; Duker JS; Fujimoto JG
Ophthalmology; 2013 Nov; 120(11):2184-90. PubMed ID: 23755873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability and reproducibility of anterior ocular biometric measurements with 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography.
Fukuda S; Kawana K; Yasuno Y; Oshika T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1867-73. PubMed ID: 21029894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo biometry in the mouse eye with low coherence interferometry.
Schmucker C; Schaeffel F
Vision Res; 2004; 44(21):2445-56. PubMed ID: 15358080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anterior ocular biometry using 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography.
Fukuda S; Kawana K; Yasuno Y; Oshika T
Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):882-9. PubMed ID: 19410946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fully automated biometry of in situ intraocular lenses using long scan depth spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
Chen Q; Leng L; Zhu D; Wang Y; Shao Y; Wang J; Lu F; Shen M
Eye Contact Lens; 2014 Jan; 40(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 24335453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster.
Huang J; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Chen H; Lu W; Hu Q; Bao F; Wang Q
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Air-Puff-Induced Dynamics of Ocular Components Measured with Optical Biometry.
Maczynska E; Rzeszewska-Zamiara J; Jimenez Villar A; Wojtkowski M; Kaluzny BJ; Grulkowski I
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 May; 60(6):1979-1986. PubMed ID: 31050724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior chamber width measurement by high-speed optical coherence tomography.
Goldsmith JA; Li Y; Chalita MR; Westphal V; Patil CA; Rollins AM; Izatt JA; Huang D
Ophthalmology; 2005 Feb; 112(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15691557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Matching the LenStar optical biometer to A-Scan ultrasonography for use in small animal eyes with application to tree shrews.
El Hamdaoui M; Gann DW; Norton TT; Grytz R
Exp Eye Res; 2019 Mar; 180():250-259. PubMed ID: 30593786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Submicrometer precision biometry of the anterior segment of the human eye.
Drexler W; Baumgartner A; Findl O; Hitzenberger CK; Sattmann H; Fercher AF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Jun; 38(7):1304-13. PubMed ID: 9191593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole eye axial biometry during accommodation using ultra-long scan depth optical coherence tomography.
Zhong J; Tao A; Xu Z; Jiang H; Shao Y; Zhang H; Liu C; Wang J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 157(5):1064-69. PubMed ID: 24487051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biometric investigation of ocular components in amblyopia.
Cass K; Tromans C
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 18761480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic biometry of the anterior segment during accommodation imaged by optical coherence tomography.
Zhu D; Shao Y; Leng L; Xu Z; Wang J; Lu F; Shen M
Eye Contact Lens; 2014 Jul; 40(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 24901975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept-source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters.
Ferrer-Blasco T; Domínguez-Vicent A; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Aloy MA; Adsuara JE; Montés-Micó R
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 255(2):343-349. PubMed ID: 27900479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The development of the refractive status and ocular growth in C57BL/6 mice.
Zhou X; Shen M; Xie J; Wang J; Jiang L; Pan M; Qu J; Lu F
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 49(12):5208-14. PubMed ID: 18689702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normal development of refractive state and ocular dimensions in guinea pigs.
Zhou X; Qu J; Xie R; Wang R; Jiang L; Zhao H; Wen J; Lu F
Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2815-23. PubMed ID: 16723148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ocular tissue imaging using ultrahigh-resolution, full-field optical coherence tomography.
Grieve K; Paques M; Dubois A; Sahel J; Boccara C; Le Gargasson JF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Nov; 45(11):4126-31. PubMed ID: 15505065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer.
Cruysberg LP; Doors M; Verbakel F; Berendschot TT; De Brabander J; Nuijts RM
Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 19692383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
