These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21726695)
21. Resin-based composite as a direct esthetic restorative material. Malhotra N; Mala K; Acharya S Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Jun; 32(5):14-23; quiz 24, 38. PubMed ID: 21755892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fluoride release from restorative materials and a luting cement. Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M; Karantakis P; Papadogiannis Y; Kapetanios H J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Aug; 86(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 11514802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative analysis of tensile bond strength of two new fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques. Dhar V; Tandon S J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1999 Jun; 17(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 10863491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of external bleaching on restorative materials: a review. El-Murr J; Ruel D; St-Georges AJ J Can Dent Assoc; 2011; 77():b59. PubMed ID: 21627869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the effect of topical fluorides on the commercially available conventional glass ionomers, resin modified glass ionomers and polyacid modified composite resins--an in vitro study. Setty JV; Singh S; Subba Reddy VV J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):55-69. PubMed ID: 14700337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Resin modified glass ionomer restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions have similar if not better retention rates than resin composites (UT CAT #628). Price J; Kinard S; Haveman C Tex Dent J; 2012 Mar; 129(3):284. PubMed ID: 22667062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Examination of a resin-modified glass-ionomer material as a pit and fissure sealant. Johnson LM; Duke ES; Camm J; Hermesch CB; Buikema DJ Quintessence Int; 1995 Dec; 26(12):879-83. PubMed ID: 8596819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dental materials: 1995 literature review. Lloyd CH; Scrimgeour SN; Brown D; Clarke RL; Curtis RV; Hatton PV; Ireland AJ; McCabe JF; Nicholson JW; Setcos JC; Sherriff M; van Noort R; Watts DC; Whitters CJ; Wood D J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):173-208. PubMed ID: 9175346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gazing into the future of esthetic restorative materials. Bowen RL; Eichmiller FC; Marjenhoff WA J Am Dent Assoc; 1992 May; 123(5):32-9. PubMed ID: 1597639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents. Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials. Cohen BI; Volovich Y; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS Gen Dent; 2001; 49(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 12017792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. New materials on the horizon. Simonsen RJ J Am Dent Assoc; 1991 Jul; 122(7):24-31. PubMed ID: 1861009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations. Owens BM; Johnson WW Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The battle of the bonds. Platt JA; Reifeis PE; MacPherson ME; Willis LH; Kirkup ML; Rhodes B; Brown DT J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2012; 91(2):20-2. PubMed ID: 23155889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]