These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21726695)
41. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations. Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements. Torres-Sánchez C; Montoya-Salazar V; Córdoba P; Vélez C; Guzmán-Duran A; Gutierrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials. Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Characterization of glass ionomer cements containing resin]. Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(1):36-53. PubMed ID: 9304122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A study of the fracture resistance of nyyar cores of three restorative materials. Ferrier S; Sekhon BS; Brunton PA Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 18505221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of dental material fluorescence on DIAGNOdent readings. Hitij T; Fidler A Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Feb; 66(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 18320413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies. Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives. Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Mineral loss on adjacent enamel glass ionomer cements restorations after cariogenic and erosive challenges. Salas CF; Guglielmi CA; Raggio DP; Mendes FM Arch Oral Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(10):1014-9. PubMed ID: 21489401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Surface roughness analysis of four restorative materials exposed to 10% and 15% carbamide peroxide. Zavanelli AC; Mazaro VQ; Silva CR; Zavanelli RA; Mancuso DN Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 21479284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Influence of the application time on the penetration of different dental adhesives and a fissure sealant into artificial subsurface lesions in bovine enamel. Meyer-Lueckel H; Paris S; Mueller J; Cölfen H; Kielbassa AM Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 16040112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Efficiency of protective sealants for glass ionomer cements. Haddad D; Mount GJ; Makinson OF Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):286-8. PubMed ID: 1299260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material. Guzman AF; Moore BK; Andres CJ Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9495160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Robert C. Margeas, DDS, discusses the latest trends in minimally invasive dentistry. Margeas RC Dent Today; 2013 Apr; 32(4):26. PubMed ID: 23659094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. What is different in operative dentistry? Overton JD Tex Dent J; 2010 Mar; 127(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 20391946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. In vitro evaluation of marginal leakage using invasive and noninvasive technique of light cure glass ionomer and flowable polyacid modified composite resin used as pit and fissure sealant. Singla A; Garg S; Jindal SK; Suma Sogi HP; Sharma D Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21891886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Core materials: when do you use them? What type is best? Miller MB Gen Dent; 2007; 55(3):183. PubMed ID: 17511358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. A comparative evaluation of four adhesive tooth coloured restorative materials. An invitro study. Nayak UA; Sudha P; Vidya M Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12420568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner. Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]