These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21726815)

  • 1. Failure of origin activation in response to fork stalling leads to chromosomal instability at fragile sites.
    Ozeri-Galai E; Lebofsky R; Rahat A; Bester AC; Bensimon A; Kerem B
    Mol Cell; 2011 Jul; 43(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 21726815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site.
    Letessier A; Millot GA; Koundrioukoff S; Lachagès AM; Vogt N; Hansen RS; Malfoy B; Brison O; Debatisse M
    Nature; 2011 Feb; 470(7332):120-3. PubMed ID: 21258320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual Roles of Poly(dA:dT) Tracts in Replication Initiation and Fork Collapse.
    Tubbs A; Sridharan S; van Wietmarschen N; Maman Y; Callen E; Stanlie A; Wu W; Wu X; Day A; Wong N; Yin M; Canela A; Fu H; Redon C; Pruitt SC; Jaszczyszyn Y; Aladjem MI; Aplan PD; Hyrien O; Nussenzweig A
    Cell; 2018 Aug; 174(5):1127-1142.e19. PubMed ID: 30078706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the molecular basis of common fragile sites instability: role of the proteins involved in the recovery of stalled replication forks.
    Franchitto A; Pichierri P
    Cell Cycle; 2011 Dec; 10(23):4039-46. PubMed ID: 22101264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DNA replication stress drives fragile site instability.
    Irony-Tur Sinai M; Kerem B
    Mutat Res; 2018 Mar; 808():56-61. PubMed ID: 29074228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genome instability at common fragile sites: searching for the cause of their instability.
    Franchitto A
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():730714. PubMed ID: 24083238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insights into common fragile site instability: DNA replication challenges at DNA repeat sequences.
    Irony-Tur Sinai M; Kerem B
    Emerg Top Life Sci; 2023 Dec; 7(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 37876349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AT-dinucleotide rich sequences drive fragile site formation.
    Irony-Tur Sinai M; Salamon A; Stanleigh N; Goldberg T; Weiss A; Wang YH; Kerem B
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Oct; 47(18):9685-9695. PubMed ID: 31410468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of fork stalling and DNA structures in causing chromosome fragility.
    Kaushal S; Freudenreich CH
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2019 May; 58(5):270-283. PubMed ID: 30536896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast.
    Admire A; Shanks L; Danzl N; Wang M; Weier U; Stevens W; Hunt E; Weinert T
    Genes Dev; 2006 Jan; 20(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 16384935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Replication stress induces specific enrichment of RECQ1 at common fragile sites FRA3B and FRA16D.
    Lu X; Parvathaneni S; Hara T; Lal A; Sharma S
    Mol Cancer; 2013 Apr; 12(1):29. PubMed ID: 23601052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors governs common fragile site instability in cancer.
    Ozeri-Galai E; Tur-Sinai M; Bester AC; Kerem B
    Cell Mol Life Sci; 2014 Dec; 71(23):4495-506. PubMed ID: 25297918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Secondary structure formation and DNA instability at fragile site FRA16B.
    Burrow AA; Marullo A; Holder LR; Wang YH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 May; 38(9):2865-77. PubMed ID: 20071743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Replication fork recovery and regulation of common fragile sites stability.
    Franchitto A; Pichierri P
    Cell Mol Life Sci; 2014 Dec; 71(23):4507-17. PubMed ID: 25216703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High speed of fork progression induces DNA replication stress and genomic instability.
    Maya-Mendoza A; Moudry P; Merchut-Maya JM; Lee M; Strauss R; Bartek J
    Nature; 2018 Jul; 559(7713):279-284. PubMed ID: 29950726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initiation of genome instability and preneoplastic processes through loss of Fhit expression.
    Saldivar JC; Miuma S; Bene J; Hosseini SA; Shibata H; Sun J; Wheeler LJ; Mathews CK; Huebner K
    PLoS Genet; 2012; 8(11):e1003077. PubMed ID: 23209436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DNA instability at chromosomal fragile sites in cancer.
    Dillon LW; Burrow AA; Wang YH
    Curr Genomics; 2010 Aug; 11(5):326-37. PubMed ID: 21286310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impaired Replication Timing Promotes Tissue-Specific Expression of Common Fragile Sites.
    Maccaroni K; Balzano E; Mirimao F; Giunta S; Pelliccia F
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 32204553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-wide identification of replication fork stalling/pausing sites and the interplay between RNA Pol II transcription and DNA replication progression.
    Rojas P; Wang J; Guglielmi G; Sadurnì MM; Pavlou L; Leung GHD; Rajagopal V; Spill F; Saponaro M
    Genome Biol; 2024 May; 25(1):126. PubMed ID: 38773641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replication delay along FRA7H, a common fragile site on human chromosome 7, leads to chromosomal instability.
    Hellman A; Rahat A; Scherer SW; Darvasi A; Tsui LC; Kerem B
    Mol Cell Biol; 2000 Jun; 20(12):4420-7. PubMed ID: 10825205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.