These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21727295)

  • 1. Metabias: a challenge for comparative effectiveness research.
    Goodman S; Dickersin K
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 21727295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ISAT trial.
    Britz GW; Newell DW; West GA; Lam A
    Lancet; 2003 Feb; 361(9355):431-2; author reply 432. PubMed ID: 12573405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Toward a comparative effectiveness policy in Italy].
    Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2011; 35(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 21628748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An index for assessing blindness in a multi-centre clinical trial: disulfiram for alcohol cessation--a VA cooperative study.
    James KE; Bloch DA; Lee KK; Kraemer HC; Fuller RK
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1421-34. PubMed ID: 8841652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis.
    da Costa BR; Hilfiker R; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 23177896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The randomized clinical trial: beware of limitations.
    Singh K
    J Glaucoma; 2004 Apr; 13(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 15097251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. TREAT: tamper-resistant envelope allocation technique for a multisite study.
    Sheeder J; Seale RA; Weber Yorga KD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():280-3. PubMed ID: 26415578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Ten Have TR; Kimmel SE
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Jul; 135(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 11453711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Challenge of conducting a multicenter clinical trial: experience in commencing a vulvodynia research protocol.
    Brown CS; Bachmann GA; Foster DC;
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2013 Mar; 22(3):291-2. PubMed ID: 23421582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Research: From Case Reports to International Multicenter Clinical Trials.
    Finfer S; Cook D; Machado FR; Perner A
    Crit Care Med; 2021 Nov; 49(11):1866-1882. PubMed ID: 34387238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: quality of design is not the only relevant variable.
    Berk PD; Sacks HS
    Hepatology; 1999 Nov; 30(5):1332-4. PubMed ID: 10534359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What can epidemiology contribute to comparative effectiveness research?
    Chubak J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2013 Mar; 67(3):206-7. PubMed ID: 23180807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The independent statistician for data monitoring committees.
    DeMets DL; Fleming TR
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1513-7. PubMed ID: 15122729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized controlled trials 1: Design.
    Curtis BM; Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():159-75. PubMed ID: 25694309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dutch probiotics study is criticised for its "design, approval, and conduct".
    Sheldon T
    BMJ; 2010 Jan; 340():c77. PubMed ID: 20053835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Avoiding Pitfalls With Implementation of Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trials: Strategies to Achieve Milestones.
    Carter BL; Ardery G
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Dec; 5(12):. PubMed ID: 27993832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Are treatment effects or adverse effects of significance for the association between financing and conclusions in randomized trials?].
    Als-Nielsen BE; Chen W; Gluud CN; Gluud LL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Apr; 166(18):1676-8. PubMed ID: 15174406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A perfect storm: how a randomized trial of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations' (ARUBA's) trial design challenges notions of external validity.
    Cockroft KM; Jayaraman MV; Amin-Hanjani S; Derdeyn CP; McDougall CG; Wilson JA
    Stroke; 2012 Jul; 43(7):1979-81. PubMed ID: 22669406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of a Rigorous Quality Program on 3D Echocardiography Data Quality in an International Multisite Randomized Trial.
    Crowley AL; Yow E; Rabineau D; Norris C; White J; Daubert MA; Velazquez EJ; Barnhart H; Krucoff MW; Rao SV; Douglas PS
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 11(12):1918-1920. PubMed ID: 30121272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.